Q. regarding current induction

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
2 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Q. regarding current induction

SArjuna

On Charles' site there are very interesting waveforms from different mobile
phone technologies. Also this statement:

Based on the assumption, that the induction of body currents increases with
the frequency, the steepness of amplitude and the height of the amplitude
(dynamics)....

Would someone please put the above into layman's language?
Thanks,
Shivani


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Q. regarding current induction

charles-4
I'll give it a try.

Normal waves, like radio en television do not harm us, when theirr intensity
is low, which is in general.
Only people living close to those transmittors (like in Hawaii and
Schwarzenburg) are hindered by them.
Normal waves consist of nice sinus forms.

However, mobile phones etc. use nice sinus high frequency carrier waves, but
the information is inhabited in the pulsed lowfrequency waves.
And these waves are not nice sinus, but more square formed, and their form
is very steep.
Look at: http://www.milieuziektes.nl/Pagina112e.html

It has been established, that when the high frequency carriers are not
pulsed, they would not be that devastating to our bodies.
The danger lies in the pulsing.
217 Hz. 1733 Hz, 10 Hz, 17.6 Hz, 15.000 Hz, etc.
217 Hz means 217 sharp pulses per second.

Greetings,
Charles Claessens
member Verband Baubiologie
www.milieuziektes.nl
www.milieuziektes.be
www.hetbitje.nl
checked by Norton Antivirus


----- Original Message -----
From: <[hidden email]>
To: <[hidden email]>
Sent: Sunday, November 27, 2005 03:46
Subject: [eSens] Q. regarding current induction


>
> On Charles' site there are very interesting waveforms from different
> mobile
> phone technologies. Also this statement:
>
> Based on the assumption, that the induction of body currents increases
> with
> the frequency, the steepness of amplitude and the height of the amplitude
> (dynamics)....
>
> Would someone please put the above into layman's language?
> Thanks,
> Shivani
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
>