Q LINK PENDANTS

Hello all

I know that the Q link pendant has been done to death on the forum before but I just got a mail shot in which it was very impressively described as being the last word in radiation protection and endorsed by all sorts of doctors from eg Stanford university etc - AND offering a 3 months trial and return option - so I am just wondering is it still regarded as bogus??? or might it be worth a try?

Interested in what others think
love
Steph

> I know that the Q link pendant has been done to death on the forum before
> but I just got a mail shot in which it was very impressively described as
> being the last word in radiation protection and endorsed by all sorts of
> doctors from eg Stanford university etc - AND offering a 3 months trial and
> return option - so I am just wondering is it still regarded as bogus??? or
> might it be worth a try?

As I recall, there were at least one or two people here who were reporting
good results with the Q-Link.  It's just that of the people here who have tried
it, the percentage of people reporting benefits seemed to be very low.
Although, I suppose you could say that about most ES treatments/cures?

But those bold proclamations about the Q-Link aren't anything new -- I
remember reading stuff like that 12 years ago.  But I still didn't find the
Q-Link helpful (for me).

Marc

Thanks Marc - it is the old story isn't it that what works for one does not work for another -interestingly I have just been looking at Gilligan Joy's webpage and he now does include the Q Link pendant on his list of devices which he recommends
Steph

On November  2, "Steph Smith [via ES]" <[hidden email]> wrote:
> Thanks Marc - it is the old story isn't it that what works for one does not
> work for another -interestingly I have just been looking at Gilligan Joy's
> webpage and he now does include the Q Link pendant on his list of devices
> which he recommends

Yes, I see that.  And I also see that his opinion of the Q-Link is pretty much
the same as mine -- it didn't help *me*, but I've *heard* that it helped others.

And although he's got a long list of EMF protection devices on his website,
I see that he does not list the two brands that were most helpful to me --
Quantum Products & Springlife Polarizers.  Oh well, at least he mentions
Earthcalm, which is something I'm using more & more lately.

Marc

Mark,  Which Earthcalm products have you been using? Do you use them mainly because they alleviate your particular issues or is it because of research that has shown their effectiveness or... ? Ellen

On November  4, "Ellen [via ES]" <[hidden email]> wrote:
> Mark,  Which Earthcalm products have you been using? Do you use them mainly
> because they alleviate your particular issues or is it because of research
> that has shown their effectiveness or... ? Ellen

I've been using the Earthcalm Scalar Resonator, which is a previous model (they are now selling "Nova" Resonators).  I'm using these because I feel better when I use them (better computer tolerance, better sleep overnight, better energy/strength).  The only negative I'm finding is that if I wear it all the time, I get headaches.  So taking breaks helps with that.

These used to sell for $350, but I bought mine used on eBay for less than $150.

Marc

Hi Marc

What is a springlife polarizer and what do you find it to be helpful with?

Steph

On November  6, "Steph Smith [via ES]" <[hidden email]> wrote:
> Hi Marc
> What is a springlife polarizer and what do you find it to be helpful with?
> Steph

A "Springlife Polarizer" is something that is no longer manufactured or sold.  It must be one
of the very first "EMF Protection Devices" on the market (starting as far back as the 1960s?),
but disappeared from the market a few years ago.  It was also sold to improve health/decrease
toxicity in your foods environment/food.  I have found it very helpful for boosting my immune
system, decreasing my reactions to things, etc.  

I used to recommend it here on this group back when you could still buy one, but now the
only people who have them are those who bought them years ago.  I don't know where
else you could buy one (maybe from a fellow group member who no longer wants it?).
It is extremely rare that a used one shows up on eBay...

Marc

Thanks Marc

sounds like it might be helpful - did you encounter any problems or reactions with using it

Steph

On November  7, "Steph Smith [via ES]" <[hidden email]> wrote:
> sounds like it might be helpful - did you encounter any problems or
> reactions with using it

Yes, the Springlife Polarizers are very good at provoking a "detox" reaction.   I had to really limit my exposure to them at first.  In fact, I still (all these years later) cannot wear a larger Springlife Polarizer 24/7 due to this -- I think it causes toxins to be mobilized that my body cannot keep up with.

(and since these devices do absolutely nothing to bind and remove toxins from the body, they could be classified as "mobilizers")

Marc

Ah, so if you had a springlife polarizer which provokes a detox reaction but only mobilises the toxins then you would need to be doing something in conjunction with it to actually remove the toxins

I recently saw an article online about ES where a practicioner was advocating the use of about 30 chlorella tablets a day for ES - but to my mind I thought that the wisdom about chlorella was that it was a mobiliser and that it didn't necessarily get rid of the mercury - am I right in thinking that? and is spirulina the same???

Thanks
Steph

Yes -- to detox, you definitely need to provide some way for toxins to get
out of your body, and some of these EMF protection devices just seem to
stir up toxins.  But stirring them up can be the first step in getting them
out, if you are doing other things to help get them out.

Chlorella is one of those controversial things... some people insist that it only
makes things worse, while others seem to do well on it.  For me, Chlorella
tends to make me feel good at first, then bad later.  So I've never thought it
a good idea to even try taking 30 tables per day!  You also need to find a
brand that is relatively uncontaminated by heavy metals.

Spirulina is definitely different than chlorella -- I never see anyone
claiming it as a cure to ES or heavy metal poisoning.  But they
are both algeas, and they are both green.  :-)

Marc

On November  8, "Steph Smith [via ES]" <[hidden email]> wrote:
> but to my mind I thought that the wisdom about chlorella was that it was a mobiliser
> and that it didn't necessarily get rid of the mercury - am I right in
> thinking that?

Also, I think that some people do claim that chlorella is a binder -- specifically, something
that binds to toxins in the digestive tract.  They often recommend taking cilantro at the same
time, as the cilantro acts as a mobilizer.

Although if I ignore this information and merely go off of my own personal experiences
with chlorella and cilantro, I'd say that the reverse is true -- the cilantro is the binder,
and chlorella is the mobilizer!

Marc

So Marc would you say that the Cilantro/Chlorella combination has worked for you [irrespective of which of the mechanisms they perform]

What amounts do you take and according to what regimen - ie how many days on how many days off etc - I know that every one will react differently and need to work out their own levels but it would be good to know what you used as a starting point

Thanks
Steph

On November 22, "Steph Smith [via ES]" <[hidden email]> wrote:
> So Marc would you say that the Cilantro/Chlorella combination has worked for
> you [irrespective of which of the mechanisms they perform]

I would say that it has appeared to work for me.  That is, my overall health improved
during the years I used these, and then it went downhill during the years after I
stopped, and then it improved again after I resumed taking it.

Mostly I have taken a product called "NDF" (Natural Detox Factors), which are liquid
drops that contain chlorella, cilantro, and some other ingredients.  

I have tried chlorella tables and also cilantro essential oil, but have not liked these
as well.
 
There are also other products that combine chlorella and cilantro together --
HMD (Heavy Metal Detox) comes to mind.  But I don't have much experience with that.

> What amounts do you take and according to what regimen - ie how many days on
> how many days off etc - I know that every one will react differently and
> need to work out their own levels but it would be good to know what you used
> as a starting point

With NDF, I'd first try one drop and see what happens.  Then adjust dosage
depending on your reaction (or lack of reaction to that).  For me, a typical dose
of NDF is around 3 - 6 drops at a time, maybe once or twice per day.  The label
says you can take up to 50 drops per day, but I don't believe that I've ever taken
that much.

Marc

Hi Marc

Thanks for this post - it is very helpful - is NDF a product you can get from most websites or is it particular to a certain retailer? I would be very interested in giving it a try - something else I just thought of - I still have some amalgam (mercury) fillings left [hence the specialist dentist visit - ha!] - can I start taking NDF while I still am waiting to get the last of the amalgam fillings out or would I be better to get them all out and then start the NDF after that?

Thanks

Steph

On November 23, "Steph Smith [via ES]" <[hidden email]> wrote:
> Thanks for this post - it is very helpful - is NDF a product you can get
> from most websites or is it particular to a certain retailer? I would be
> very interested in giving it a try - something else I just thought of - I
> still have some amalgam (mercury) fillings left [hence the specialist
> dentist visit - ha!] - can I start taking NDF while I still am waiting to
> get the last of the amalgam fillings out or would I be better to get them
> all out and then start the NDF after that?

You can buy NDF (manufacturer is BioRay) from Amazon.com and probably
a lot of other places.  However, I would personally wait until you have had
all of your amalgam fillings SAFELY removed before doing anything to
stir up any more mercury into your system.

Marc

I also have a Springlife Polarizer.
Its properties are incorporated in the ClaeSmog, together with other *gizmo's*.

I have a carton full of different gizmo's, who all do work, more or less.
F.i. the Bio Electrical Shield, the Nabat, its successor the Atox, and of course the BioProtect card.
Compared to them, the Bioprotect equals them, and is the cheapest.

The problems with elektrosmog are not a technical issue, but a biological one.
All answers can be found with *longitudinal waves*.
Special shieldings can eliminate its biological effects on the body.

My wife was a hard electrosensitive, and some years ago we have fled the Netherlands into Belgium.
Now we live in a city, in an appartment, amidst of 10 mobile phone masts, DECT's etc. which do not bother her anymore, not even on the streets.
I have a new small device, which does make small pulses. When I start it, my wife flees the appartment.
I have shielded it by reflecting the radiating longitudinal waves, and now it stands besides her, without any adverse health effects.

On November 24, "charles [via ES]" <[hidden email]> w
> I also have a Springlife Polarizer.
> Its properties are incorporated in the ClaeSmog, together with other
> *gizmo's*.
>
> I have a carton full of different gizmo's, who all do work, more or less.
> F.i. the Bio Electrical Shield, the Nabat, its successor the Atox, and of
> course the BioProtect card.
> Compared to them, the Bioprotect equals them, and is the cheapest.

You may think they are all about the same, but in my experience they are
quite different.  Some help, some don't, and some make things worse.

The other day I had both a ClaesSmog in my pocket plus a Springlife
Polarizer a couple feet away from me.  This was not a good combination,
as it made me nauseous and I felt like I was about to vomit.  Getting
away from both got rid of that effect.  I'll have to experiment and see
if that is repeatable.

Marc

Hello Marc,

yes, you are right.
There are many differences.

Because the ClaeSmog is very strong, and its working is based on transmitting longitudinal waves, it is normal that it may have an influence on other *gizmo's*, and reinforcing their workings.
That may result in a too heavy working.

You do have a normal one and a light one.
Perhaps the light one may be better with the Springlife Polarizer, which is in itsself very strong.

It is a shame that the Springlife Polarizer is out of business.