New Comcast wireless modems...

Ugh!!

This newbie in Comcast technology was introduced to me last Sunday when I was tricked by Comcast into allowing a technician to come on the pretense that I was getting a promo for triple play.  He knew nothing about that but his work order clearly stated that he was in my home to install the latest in wireless technologies...

Now and in the future, the goal is to install these ?Max towers for phone service and possible internet service.  I already have a wired modem.  I was appalled when he installed the new box without my awareness and within 5 minutes my nervous system was completely disoriented (fried), I had a severe headache and continued to feel disoriented for several hours after he had taken it out of my living space.  Now the mere thought of the device makes me anxious (Pavlov dog's experiment).

It may have been worse because of the 5 layers of foil that enclose my space.  Even with my shielding jumper on- it did little for me.  I was able to inform the tech about the condition of EHS and that what is happening so fast could be nothing short of potential genocide. 

How would someone like me have any phone or internet service in the future?  This was by far the worst experience that I have personally had since first coming down with EHS 4 years ago (when I had no knowledge of shielding).

I haven't experienced the so-called Smart Meters phenom as of yet.  It's hard to imagine it being worse than what I experienced from Comcast on Sunday.  This thing was pouring radio waves out of it from all sides.  I wished I had had some sort of meter. 

Who has given these companies the authority to play with human lives to decide who lives and who may just die or wish that they were dead?  Who can be sued with the godless Telecom Act of 1996?  Should we be now suing the US government itself for allowing this outrageous threat to people's lives?

Has anyone else on eSens experienced this technology yet?  Here's the fact... one year ago when I got cable I was automatically given a modem with cords...this past Sunday I was told by a tech that this new wireless modem was the wave of the future and it is what the consumer is asking for-- they can't get it fast enough!  When are people on this site going to begin the real fight of putting the brakes on some of this insanity?

Imagine this:

Hypothetically, 5 years from now could feel like this...you have a stupid Smart Meter in your house recording your every move and one or two of these new wireless modems providing your phone and internet service so that you can no longer use a cord.  You are neighbors with an apartment building where everyone has one of these new modems spraying godless radio waves into your home (worse than DECT stations and wireless routers combined).  Can you survive this? It was bad before-- now hell has descended unless you can figure out how to fix your underlying problem that caused this imbalance to begin with.  Only problem is, society is the imbalance and doesn't someone pay whenever there's imbalance?  Oh and do remember that the Super WIFI technologies supposedly coming in 2014 will bring in the "noise" of the white spaces which are much lower frequencies and will be virtually unregulated as well.  How will we shield the entire low end of the spectrum. 
 Who's creating the technologies that will save us in the not-so-distant future?

Who can help here, anyone?

Thanks,
Pam

I


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

On October  3, pamela clemonts <[hidden email]> wrote:
> Who can help here, anyone?

Cancel the service.  Get a different Internet
service provider.  

Or replace the Comcast wireless modem with a
wired modem.  Comcast will probably do it for you
if attempt to cancel the service.  Or if not,
buy an old one on eBay.

Marc

I have been given wireless modems on the basis that you can go wired, I  
need one that can support a lan for 2 pcs - but everytime I test the ethernet  
wired connection on these wireless modems/routers I find the wifi signal is
 still there and not disabled !!!!
 
puk
 
same for the XBOX that's pumping out wifi all the time evan on  standby
until you unplug it !
 
 
In a message dated 03/10/2012 18:05:27 GMT Daylight Time,  
[hidden email] writes:

 
 
 
On October 3, pamela clemonts <_adiaha22@yahoo.com_
(mailto:[hidden email]) > wrote:
>  Who can help here, anyone?

Cancel the service. Get a different  Internet
service provider.

Or replace the Comcast wireless modem  with a
wired modem. Comcast will probably do it for you
if attempt to  cancel the service. Or if not,
buy an old one on  eBay.

Marc





[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Hi Marc,

Of course. I made him take it out.  What could I do?  There was no way that I could tolerate that thing.  It felt worse than DECT and wireless router combined.  But that's not the point.  I was told by the tech that this is the wave of the future. In other words, there may come a time in the near future when these wireless modems WILL BE the standard.  This is what the people think they want.  I am suggesting that if that happens, then the outcry may become as intense as the one regarding the Smart meters.

If people think that a fight can be avoided down the road they may be very naive.  I can't even think about that device without getting my nervous system in an uproar!

But thanks for reminding me that at least for now my wired box still works.  If it ever breaks down though I may be in trouble.  I guess any of us may say that and that is why I posted this to eSens.  Have you experienced this tower yet for yourself?  It wasn't around a year ago, so all of its potential environmental harm lies in front of us.  I wonder how many of my neighbors have this now? You wouldn't know of anyone who gets affected by the electronics that their neighbors are using would you?  If so, I really feel sorry for them in a few years.

Pam

--- On Wed, 10/3/12, Marc Martin <[hidden email]> wrote:

From: Marc Martin <[hidden email]>
Subject: Re: [eSens] New Comcast wireless modems...
To: [hidden email]
Date: Wednesday, October 3, 2012, 1:05 PM
















 



 


   
     
     
      On October  3, pamela clemonts <[hidden email]> wrote:

> Who can help here, anyone?



Cancel the service.  Get a different Internet

service provider.  



Or replace the Comcast wireless modem with a

wired modem.  Comcast will probably do it for you

if attempt to cancel the service.  Or if not,

buy an old one on eBay.



Marc



   
     

   
   






 










[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Hey Paul,

Was the wireless modem that you have come from Comcast?  Was it that tank looking metal tower that you plug your phone line into.  I don't even know how it works.  I told the guy to get it out of my home.  I never ordered it.  If you can tolerate that thing are you sure that you're EHS?  I can't even tolerate thinking about what it did to me in less than 10 minutes.  How do you stand it?

Pam


--- On Wed, 10/3/12, [hidden email] <[hidden email]> wrote:

From: [hidden email] <[hidden email]>
Subject: Re: [eSens] New Comcast wireless modems...
To: [hidden email]
Date: Wednesday, October 3, 2012, 1:14 PM
















 



 


   
     
     
      I have been given wireless modems on the basis that you can go wired, I  

need one that can support a lan for 2 pcs - but everytime I test the ethernet  

wired connection on these wireless modems/routers I find the wifi signal is

 still there and not disabled !!!!

 

puk

 

same for the XBOX that's pumping out wifi all the time evan on  standby

until you unplug it !

 

 

In a message dated 03/10/2012 18:05:27 GMT Daylight Time,  

[hidden email] writes:



On October 3, pamela clemonts <_adiaha22@yahoo.com_

(mailto:[hidden email]) > wrote:

>  Who can help here, anyone?



Cancel the service. Get a different  Internet

service provider.



Or replace the Comcast wireless modem  with a

wired modem. Comcast will probably do it for you

if attempt to  cancel the service. Or if not,

buy an old one on  eBay.



Marc



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]





   
     

   
   






 










[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

On October  3, pamela clemonts <[hidden email]> wrote:
> I was told by the tech that this is the wave of the future.
> In other words, there may come a time in the near future when
> these wireless modems WILL BE the standard. 

Well, the old technology works fine -- for
now.  When something newer (fiber optics?) is
deployed, we may have some new challenges to face.
Of course, one could detox and improve nutrition
in the meantime.

> But thanks for reminding me that at least for now my wired
> box still works.  If it ever breaks down though I may be
> in trouble.

If that worries you, then you could buy (on eBay?) the same
model that you have now as a backup.

> You wouldn't know of anyone who gets affected by the electronics
> that their neighbors are using would you?

There are many of us here who are bothered by the electronics
in use by our neighbors.  Me included, as I see that there
are about 30 wi-fi signals that my laptop can see from my
living room.

Marc

For eBay, you are talking about the box device (modem) that is installed by Comcast, right and not the wireless router that people usually buy themselves? 

Thanks again about the detox and diet check...a must do.

Pam

--- On Wed, 10/3/12, Marc Martin <[hidden email]> wrote:

From: Marc Martin <[hidden email]>
Subject: Re: [eSens] New Comcast wireless modems...
To: [hidden email]
Date: Wednesday, October 3, 2012, 1:37 PM
















 



 


   
     
     
      On October  3, pamela clemonts <[hidden email]> wrote:

> I was told by the tech that this is the wave of the future.

> In other words, there may come a time in the near future when

> these wireless modems WILL BE the standard. 



Well, the old technology works fine -- for

now.  When something newer (fiber optics?) is

deployed, we may have some new challenges to face.

Of course, one could detox and improve nutrition

in the meantime.



> But thanks for reminding me that at least for now my wired

> box still works.  If it ever breaks down though I may be

> in trouble.



If that worries you, then you could buy (on eBay?) the same

model that you have now as a backup.



> You wouldn't know of anyone who gets affected by the electronics

> that their neighbors are using would you?



There are many of us here who are bothered by the electronics

in use by our neighbors.  Me included, as I see that there

are about 30 wi-fi signals that my laptop can see from my

living room.



Marc



   
     

   
   






 










[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

On October  3, pamela clemonts <[hidden email]> wrote:
> For eBay, you are talking about the box device (modem) that
> is installed by Comcast, right and not the wireless router
> that people usually buy themselves? 

Yes, the cable modem is the item you need a backup for.
You can then just connect that to an "ethernet switch"
to get multiple connections to multiple PCs.

Someone here once mentioned that one particular model
of Comcast cable modem was better (noise-wise) than
the others, but I can't remember which one that was
(I have DSL, otherwise I would have bought one of
those).  It's probably in the archives...

Marc

On October  3, Marc Martin <[hidden email]> wrote:
> Someone here once mentioned that one particular model
> of Comcast cable modem was better (noise-wise) than
> the others, but I can't remember which one that was
> (I have DSL, otherwise I would have bought one of
> those).  It's probably in the archives...

Found it -- a Linksys CM100.  Bill Bruno said that
this particular cable modem was better than the
one that Comcast gave him.  Looks like you can buy
this for about $30 - $40 on eBay right now.

Marc

 

On October  3, Marc Martin <[hidden email]> wrote:
> Found it -- a Linksys CM100.  Bill Bruno said that
> this particular cable modem was better than the
> one that Comcast gave him.  Looks like you can buy
> this for about $30 - $40 on eBay right now.

...and presumably it is the version with the larger
power adapter, like this one:

  http://www.ebay.com/itm/330794640796

Marc

--- In [hidden email], pamela clemonts <adiaha22@...> wrote:
>
> I haven't experienced the so-called Smart Meters phenom as of yet.  >It's hard to imagine it being worse than what I experienced from >Comcast on Sunday. 

What's worse than Comcast, you ask?  How about having the technology inside your body with no escape?  This woman claims it was implanted in her against her will, secretly, by the US Dept of Defense, when she had unrelated surgery at a research hospital.  Is this something else we need to watch out for?

A lower court, and the US Court of Appeals actually heard her case rather than dismissing it without merit.  She lost the appeal, only for lack of "medical evidence" of harm.  Her testimony before a congressional committee is convincing, and well worth watching.  Her court documents are also posted online.  http://rtr.org/vid/2337/woman-in-ga-describes-the-effects-of-having-a-microchip-implanted-against-her-will 

>
>How will we shield the entire low end of the spectrum.
>Who's creating the technologies that will save us in the not-so->distant future?

The solution, I believe, is not in shielding, but in getting our bodies healed and functioning the way they were meant to, so we can resist the onslaught and remain healthy.  I am currently involved in research that holds great promise to do this, by restoring the precise frequency balance that each individual body needs.  

In the meantime, like Marc said, optimize your nutrition, which means get off wheat, sugars, and all processed food and GMO's, and eat plenty of healthy saturated fats. Detox and support your liver and colon and kidneys, stop using toxic chemicals on your body and in your home.  The more damaged you are, the more meticulous you need to be.  And be very vigilant to stay positive, with much gratitude and no fear, at all costs.

Awesome!  Do you think that we will always be able to get these into the future?

Pam

--- On Wed, 10/3/12, Marc Martin <[hidden email]> wrote:

From: Marc Martin <[hidden email]>
Subject: Re: [eSens] New Comcast wireless modems...
To: [hidden email]
Date: Wednesday, October 3, 2012, 1:57 PM
















 



 


   
     
     
      On October  3, Marc Martin <[hidden email]> wrote:

> Someone here once mentioned that one particular model

> of Comcast cable modem was better (noise-wise) than

> the others, but I can't remember which one that was

> (I have DSL, otherwise I would have bought one of

> those).  It's probably in the archives...



Found it -- a Linksys CM100.  Bill Bruno said that

this particular cable modem was better than the

one that Comcast gave him.  Looks like you can buy

this for about $30 - $40 on eBay right now.



Marc





   
     

   
   






 










[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Thanks so much CJ.

It's hard to believe that I could ever be totally healed without any kind of shielding.  I really needed this slap in the face (though a light one).  The tower modem was insane and I can't imagine having a chip either. Government types and military oft times already have the chips I hear.

I am grateful that I've come even this far and that I am in touch with people like the eSens gang.  I still want to know who has seen and experienced this new wireless tower modem.  It's ridiculous!

Pam

--- On Wed, 10/3/12, cjosephj <[hidden email]> wrote:

From: cjosephj <[hidden email]>
Subject: [eSens] Re: New Comcast wireless modems...
To: [hidden email]
Date: Wednesday, October 3, 2012, 3:35 PM
















 



 


   
     
     
      --- In [hidden email], pamela clemonts <adiaha22@...> wrote:

>

> I haven't experienced the so-called Smart Meters phenom as of yet.  >It's hard to imagine it being worse than what I experienced from >Comcast on Sunday. 



What's worse than Comcast, you ask?  How about having the technology inside your body with no escape?  This woman claims it was implanted in her against her will, secretly, by the US Dept of Defense, when she had unrelated surgery at a research hospital.  Is this something else we need to watch out for?



A lower court, and the US Court of Appeals actually heard her case rather than dismissing it without merit.  She lost the appeal, only for lack of "medical evidence" of harm.  Her testimony before a congressional committee is convincing, and well worth watching.  Her court documents are also posted online.  http://rtr.org/vid/2337/woman-in-ga-describes-the-effects-of-having-a-microchip-implanted-against-her-will 



>

>How will we shield the entire low end of the spectrum.

>Who's creating the technologies that will save us in the not-so->distant future?



The solution, I believe, is not in shielding, but in getting our bodies healed and functioning the way they were meant to, so we can resist the onslaught and remain healthy.  I am currently involved in research that holds great promise to do this, by restoring the precise frequency balance that each individual body needs.  



In the meantime, like Marc said, optimize your nutrition, which means get off wheat, sugars, and all processed food and GMO's, and eat plenty of healthy saturated fats. Detox and support your liver and colon and kidneys, stop using toxic chemicals on your body and in your home.  The more damaged you are, the more meticulous you need to be.  And be very vigilant to stay positive, with much gratitude and no fear, at all costs.





   
     

   
   






 










[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

On October  3, pamela clemonts <[hidden email]> wrote:
> Awesome!  Do you think that we will always be able to get these into the future?

It looks like there are a lot of these on eBay right now.
Eventually they will become hard to find, but I'd guess
they'll be easy to find for at least a few more years.

I have not seen one of these new Comcast tower modems.

Marc