Mark - a rules request

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
5 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Mark - a rules request

SArjuna
Mark, would you please elucidate about what is "proper" to post here,
and what not, regarding studies? I did not post Olle Johansson's study
summary when he sent it to me, because I had been criticised previously for posting
an article. I was told then that we were only supposed to be discussing
remedies, not causes, as it was presumed we all knew all about causes.
As I commented at that time, this strikes me as absurd, because
determining the remedy for anything depends on knowing as much as possible about the
causes. Anyway, what are our playing rules in this regard?
Thanks,
Shivani



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Mark - a rules request

Marc Martin
Administrator
> Mark, would you please elucidate about what is "proper" to
> post here, and what not, regarding studies?

I guess what I really object to is extremely long messages.
So if one copies and pastes an entire article and posts it
here, I object to that.

However, if one merely posts a link to where the article is
on the web, that's fine.

Or if one uploads an article to our eSens "files" area and
then tells everyone it is here, that's fine too.

Another issue is whether or not the article/study is really
relevant to this group. Most of the studies and articles
about EMF that I've read don't have much to do with
improving the quality of life for the electrically
sensitive.

Marc

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Mark - a rules request

Marc Martin
Administrator
In reply to this post by SArjuna
> I was told then that we were only supposed to be discussing
> remedies, not causes, as it was presumed we all knew all about causes.

I don't recall that, but I agree that discussions about
the cause of electrical hypersensitivity is certainly
relevant here.

However, discussions about EMF can be a potential cause
of cancer or other illness does not seem particularly
relevant here.

Marc

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

RE: Mark - a rules request

Benson, Sarah (Sen L. Allison)
In reply to this post by SArjuna
I very much like/want to see recent articles on ES - just as much as all
the health stuff. What's wrong with being up to date on the latest
research? I would have thought it of paramount importance. I'm all for
a spot of naval gazing, but at the end od the day it's the research that
is going to sway those in authority.

So thank you Olle!!

Sarah

-----Original Message-----
From: [hidden email] [mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf Of
Marc Martin
Sent: Saturday, 29 October 2005 2:35 AM
To: [hidden email]
Subject: Re: [eSens] Mark - a rules request


> Mark, would you please elucidate about what is "proper" to
> post here, and what not, regarding studies?

I guess what I really object to is extremely long messages.  
So if one copies and pastes an entire article and posts it here, I
object to that.  

However, if one merely posts a link to where the article is
on the web, that's fine.

Or if one uploads an article to our eSens "files" area and
then tells everyone it is here, that's fine too.

Another issue is whether or not the article/study is really relevant to
this group. Most of the studies and articles about EMF that I've read
don't have much to do with
improving the quality of life for the electrically
sensitive.

Marc



 
Yahoo! Groups Links



 

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

RE: Mark - a rules request

evie15422
And also find a cure! I agree, and I don't even have ES that I know of! :)

Diane aka Evie

"Benson, Sarah (Sen L. Allison)" <[hidden email]> wrote:
... but at the end od the day it's the research that
is going to sway those in authority.

So thank you Olle!!

Sarah


---------------------------------
Yahoo! FareChase - Search multiple travel sites in one click.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]