This is promising, what we already know but seems to reqiure validation of scientific method for people to take us seriously.
https://mieuxprevenir.blogspot.com/2022/02/first-study-so-far-5g-causes-microwave.htmlMy issue though is Hardells misreprentation of the issue as a medical one, when he himself states that removal of the toxin from the environment is the rememdey--the very defintion of a functional impairment (not a disease, but a condition of inaccessibility due to faults and flaws in the environment).
Industry and those with monied interests related to industry would benefit from mis handling EHS disability because it unjustly removes the legal burden of govt to provide accessibility in honor of human and civil rights law; medicalizing electrohypersensitivity rather than regarding it as it is, a disability, is a way to deny human and civil rights and "save money" by faulting the individual rather than the cause, the toxin in the environment.