Legal action against a Tower

My wife was affected by a 3HG Antenna tower closed to our flat by 280 m around 5-6 years ago.
We escaped it and she (and her family) faced physical and economic problems related to the RF.
Now she's better for her, but we still live out our flat in a rented flat, downtown in very old building.

Well, we'd like to start a legal action.
We met a lawyer with good competence in environmetal matters, and laws.

One of the critical points is, of course, the cause-effect relationship.

We should prepare  scientific documentation that reviews  models, patterns where the EMFs affect the neurological system and other physiological system that, at the end,  determine the ES illness.

I have some of some papers , but I would like to be sure don't miss the 'most' relevant.

Someone could help us ?

Giorgio

Hi Giorgio,

There are thousands of articles, and I agree it can be difficult to sort out the most relevant and strongest evidence. You may find this recent testimonial from David Carpenter (Director of the Institute of Health and Environment, Albany University) useful - See pages 10-22 for references to some of the strongest evidence.
http://www.scribd.com/doc/93052766/Harm-from-radiofrequency-transmissions-April-2012-see-section-5

I’m in the process of putting together a series of bibliographies  (only including studies which show effects and harm from low level EMFs).  I’ve uploaded a few of these to scribd already – but more to follow.  The include RF, ELF and magnetic fields - sorted by effects e.g. reproduction, depression etc.
http://www.scribd.com/collections/3440803/Electrosmog-Bibiographies

And if you haven't seen this site already, there may be some useful information here: http://mastsanity.org/

Hope this helps.

P.S. I also recommend these articles for anyone considering legal action

Michaels, D. (2005).  Doubt is their product. Scientific American. 292(6): 96-101.  http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=doubt-is-their-product

Dämvik M, Johansson O. (2010). Health risk assessment of electromagnetic fields: a conflict between the precautionary principle and environmental medicine methodology. Rev Environ Health. 25(4):325-33.  http://ww.milieuziektes.nl/Rapporten/D%C3%A4mvik_Johansson2010.pdf

Legal Testimony:  MICHAEL REPACHOL (former WHO’s EMF project) provided expert testimony about the safety of EMF for the OBERON POWERLINE INVESTIGATION COMMITTEE, in Australia in 1990. The transcript of his testimony is available on Andrew Marino’s website, along with extensive comments/notes. Repacholi’s text is worth reading to gain an understanding of the  technical arguments used the legal discourse of the EMF health issue. http://andrewamarino.com/repacholi.html