Why don't they make pixelQi type screens in, say, 19" size too, to
eliminate need for projector? It would be immenseley popular if they
could. [B-)]
Filters don't shield vs. fluresence, not LCDs nor LEDs, you name it.
A filter expert stated to me, that if the source of radiation is
computer screen, filtering the power will probably not be a viable
solution, as radiation is generated within screen circuitry as byproduct
of producing the image. He advocated a projector as better way to go.
Minni P.S. I prefer responses via direct email, since for personal
reasons, I can't easily cope with daily group-email option that's the
max Yahoo ridiculously offers.
--- In
[hidden email], Bill Bruno <wbruno@...> wrote:
>
> This is essentially the screen used in the OLPC.
> Apart from being too small in that case it is promising...
> especially if you turn off the backlight.
>
> E-ink screens like Kindle are even better, except the
> refresh is perhaps too slow for a computer.
>
> On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 2:25 AM, minnimall minnimall@... wrote:
>
> >
> >
> >
> > Hoping some electrical-experts can comment:
> >
> > would this be a decent solution for people sensitive to high
frequencies
> > such as computer fluresence?
> >
> > pixelqi.com
> >
> > .....in conjunction with projector
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]