Interesting

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
3 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Interesting

Elizabeth thode

Hi Everyone,
Regarding the technocracy article, last week, (for the 3rd time) I addressed my local town hall commission on the subject of smart meters.
The local paper did an article, and quoted a white paper prepared by the  "Electric Institute "...stating that radio frequency exposure of a person from continuously operating smart meters would be 125 to 1.250 LESS then that of a person using a cell phone! Just one more example of "industry spin". For those who have read the technocracy article, they ALSO mention this Institute! Coincidence? I think not.
You can draw your own conclusions...
Lizzie
     

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

My spot in the smart meter challenge

scribnerhill



Four months ago I started requesting that National Grid remove the two ERTs (according to Loni's article I guess that is a step down from a smart meter)from my house, which are attached to the other side of my kitchen wall. I have contacted them many times and have only gotten the run around - always saying that they would have a manager call me back and they never have. They will not relese any manager names, or provide any concrete data on what the frequency is or how strong it is, or how many times it signals per minute/day/month.

Last week they told me they had to check with their legal department to see if they can "legally" remove them from my home. I have had it. I called the Department of Utilities in Massachusetts thinking they could help. I explained my situation and the woman there literally laughed at me, asking how else they could get my reading when all of their meters are this way.

I told her that I could pre-pay the bills, or take a digital picture of the meters, call in the reading, whatever, but this was clearly a civil rights violation. She did stop laughing - I think she started to understand the magnitude of the problem. We will see if I hear from her again...

Anyway, just wanted to let you know that I am in the throws of the smart meter problem as well.  


Take Care-
Beth



--- In [hidden email], Elizabeth thode <lizt777@...> wrote:

>
>
> Hi Everyone,
> Regarding the technocracy article, last week, (for the 3rd time) I addressed my local town hall commission on the subject of smart meters.
> The local paper did an article, and quoted a white paper prepared by the  "Electric Institute "...stating that radio frequency exposure of a person from continuously operating smart meters would be 125 to 1.250 LESS then that of a person using a cell phone! Just one more example of "industry spin". For those who have read the technocracy article, they ALSO mention this Institute! Coincidence? I think not.
> You can draw your own conclusions...
> Lizzie
>      
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>


Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: My spot in the smart meter challenge

Loni Rosser
Wow, can you get the media involved?  Loni

--- On Mon, 6/27/11, scribnerhill <[hidden email]> wrote:


From: scribnerhill <[hidden email]>
Subject: [eSens] My spot in the smart meter challenge
To: [hidden email]
Date: Monday, June 27, 2011, 12:40 PM


 





Four months ago I started requesting that National Grid remove the two ERTs (according to Loni's article I guess that is a step down from a smart meter)from my house, which are attached to the other side of my kitchen wall. I have contacted them many times and have only gotten the run around - always saying that they would have a manager call me back and they never have. They will not relese any manager names, or provide any concrete data on what the frequency is or how strong it is, or how many times it signals per minute/day/month.

Last week they told me they had to check with their legal department to see if they can "legally" remove them from my home. I have had it. I called the Department of Utilities in Massachusetts thinking they could help. I explained my situation and the woman there literally laughed at me, asking how else they could get my reading when all of their meters are this way.

I told her that I could pre-pay the bills, or take a digital picture of the meters, call in the reading, whatever, but this was clearly a civil rights violation. She did stop laughing - I think she started to understand the magnitude of the problem. We will see if I hear from her again...

Anyway, just wanted to let you know that I am in the throws of the smart meter problem as well.

Take Care-
Beth

--- In [hidden email], Elizabeth thode <lizt777@...> wrote:

>
>
> Hi Everyone,
> Regarding the technocracy article, last week, (for the 3rd time) I addressed my local town hall commission on the subject of smart meters.
> The local paper did an article, and quoted a white paper prepared by the "Electric Institute "...stating that radio frequency exposure of a person from continuously operating smart meters would be 125 to 1.250 LESS then that of a person using a cell phone! Just one more example of "industry spin". For those who have read the technocracy article, they ALSO mention this Institute! Coincidence? I think not.
> You can draw your own conclusions...
> Lizzie
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>








[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]