I tested the barefoot method years ago and still find it refreshing and rejuvenating. Would like to sleep being grounded etc. There are several product brands available related to this.
________________________________ From: Ole Alstrup <[hidden email]> To: [hidden email] Sent: Tue, 26 January, 2010 19:20:22 Subject: [eSens] The Power of becoming Grounded David Wolfe talking about the grounding method to combat ELF/EMF http://www.youtube. com/watch? v=o9h48cpn9Oo& feature=related Is his measuring method valid? He doesnt seem to recognize that devices canhave a harmonizing effect. But I have read about this before and a friend who is a serious researcher/inventor has recommended it to me on several occasions. Anyone here with experiences? Please share! ____________ _________ _________ __ From: Marc Martin <marc@ufoseries. com> To: eSens@yahoogroups. com Sent: Tue, 26 January, 2010 18:22:41 Subject: Re: [eSens] About the QLink! > Marc, Why don't you try it again & see? Nothing to lose. I will, but only because I happen to have a Q-Link (SRT3) lying around in my garage... :-) I tried an earlier Q-Link (SRT-1?) many years ago, and it did virtually nothing for me. Marc [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] |
In reply to this post by barbpom2000
Hi, Barb,
Aloe is one of the plants referred to in the book I recommended for readingyesterday. The book includes NASA research on which plants clear which chemicals from the atmosphere. I don't remember whether emfs were addressed in the book, but we know generally speaking that emfs are drawn to high water concentrations. So, yes, aloe vera plants are high in water content and therefore would likely absorb emfs in your atmosphere. I use plants near my windows to block emfs when necessary/possible. Plants and trees are especially helpful for blocking out emfs from outside around your house, but plants help me inside, too. It is possible(tho it would need research to prove) that emf "dirty air", as Charles here has pointed out exists in some circumstances, might be removed by using plants, as well. Best wishes, Diane --- On Mon, 1/25/10, barbpom2000 <[hidden email]> wrote: From: barbpom2000 <[hidden email]> Subject: [eSens] Re: I read something in the Links area To: [hidden email] Date: Monday, January 25, 2010, 7:26 PM Kooky, I have aloe vera plants, I have one bu my computer, I have a huge one that needs repotting, should I have these all over the house. How do theyprotect against EMF's? --- In eSens@yahoogroups. com, Kooky <furstc0404@ ...> wrote: > > > Diane > > Good point about plants, they have to be taken care of. Best to avoid chems. > > Concerning plants and radiation, there are quite a few papers by scientists about some plants, with the ability to "soak" up ES/EMS/RF > > Apparently, Aloe Vera is excelent for this, as well as others. > > Kooky > > > --- On Mon, 1/25/10, Evie <evie15422@. ..> wrote: > > From: Evie <evie15422@. ..> > Subject: Re: [eSens] I read something in the Links area > To: eSens@yahoogroups. com > Date: Monday, January 25, 2010, 6:04 PM > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi, Loni, > > > > I am mold sensitive. It is easy to take care of mold issues on plants. Every 6 months, just remove the top inch or 2 of soil and replacewith clean potting soil. Also give the plants frequent soap baths--sponge them off with sudsy dish soapy water and then spray them clean. The soap kills almost any bugs which can thrive on plants. There is a great book on detoxifying your home with plants: “Howto Grow Fresh Air: 50 Houseplants that Purify Your Home and Office” by Dr. BC Wolverton > > > > Good luck, > > Diane > > --- On Mon, 1/25/10, Loni <loni326@yahoo. com> wrote: > > > > From: Loni <loni326@yahoo. com> > > Subject: Re: [eSens] I read something in the Links area > > To: eSens@yahoogroups. com > > Date: Monday, January 25, 2010, 4:34 PM > > > > > > > > I really am strongly against house plants. They attract mold. An infectedspider plant infected my house & i can't be around plants. Most people over water house plants & they harbor lots of mold. Not good for EI's. Just myexperience. Loni > > > > --- On Mon, 1/25/10, Kooky <furstc0404@ yahoo. com> wrote: > > > > From: Kooky <furstc0404@ yahoo. com> > > Subject: Re: [eSens] I read something in the Links area > > To: eSens@yahoogroups. com > > Date: Monday, January 25, 2010, 1:58 PM > > > > > > > > I have a crystal near my screen PC and many plants around > > my apartment > > > > Some plants are known to absorb EMF/RF and adapt, as well as being protective, it is a natural and harmless air purifyer. > > > > IMHO, unless tech savvy, and even then, avoidance is cheapest and most effective. Preventing high level of free radicals by taking antioxidants, healthy diet, and healthy lifestly, may help too. > > > > --- On Mon, 1/25/10, barbpom2000 <barbpom2000@ yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > From: barbpom2000 <barbpom2000@ yahoo.com> > > Subject: [eSens] I read something in the Links area > > To: eSens@yahoogroups. com > > Date: Monday, January 25, 2010, 3:35 PM > > > > > > > > Hi Everyone, I was reading in the links area a article called: A warning about EMF Protection Devices and Deceptive Advertising. I am sure many of you read it. It showed how many products just do not work in EMF reduction. After reading here, the importance of cell phone usage, turning off electrical appliances,etc. is reallly the only way to reduce EMF's. > > > > It also talked about the placibo effect some people have with certain products. I was concedering the Q-link, but Not anymore. I purchased 4 stetzers filter, and some of the Aulterra patches. After reading the article I am not sure if they really work, I guess my next purchase will have to be a meter. > > > > If I may ask, do any of you think any products really help, like the patches, Q-links, I even saw a video on You Tube, that you print out this page and the cut out a section which has all different colors on it will help with EMF, maybe called free EMF protection.. or something like that. That really got me thinking how many products could be and are a total waste of money. There is no easy fix or protection is there? > > > > There was another site, that had I think crystal you hang around your neck,which are very expensive. > > > > can you give me your favorite products if you use them or web site?? > > > > I read a phamplet from Aulterra, it looks so good for those patches. Theysay on it Can you afford to go without the BEST EMF protection money can buy? Well, if they really don't work. why buy it. > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > > > ____________ _________ _________ _________ _________ __ > > Do You Yahoo!? > > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around > > http://mail. yahoo.com > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > > > ____________ _________ _________ _________ _________ __ > > Do You Yahoo!? > > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around > > http://mail. yahoo.com > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] |
In reply to this post by alstrup
Hi, Ole,
I tried and liked going barefoot, too, but not in my own home. Going barefoot in my home causes me problems, which is also why I don't like to be grounded in bed there. If you are in an atmosphere where emfs are leaving your body, rather than entering it, I think grounding is wonderful. I personally don't like being in an atmosphere which causes the opposite, which is usually the case now in our homes. My 2 cents, for all that is worth, ;) Diane --- On Tue, 1/26/10, Ole Alstrup <[hidden email]> wrote: From: Ole Alstrup <[hidden email]> Subject: Re: [eSens] The Power of becoming Grounded To: [hidden email] Date: Tuesday, January 26, 2010, 1:34 PM I tested the barefoot method years ago and still find it refreshing and rejuvenating. Would like to sleep being grounded etc. There are several product brands available related to this. ____________ _________ _________ __ From: Ole Alstrup <alstrup@yahoo. com> To: eSens@yahoogroups. com Sent: Tue, 26 January, 2010 19:20:22 Subject: [eSens] The Power of becoming Grounded David Wolfe talking about the grounding method to combat ELF/EMF http://www.youtube. com/watch? v=o9h48cpn9Oo& feature=related Is his measuring method valid? He doesnt seem to recognize that devices canhave a harmonizing effect. But I have read about this before and a friend who is a serious researcher/inventor has recommended it to me on several occasions. Anyone here with experiences? Please share! ____________ _________ _________ __ From: Marc Martin <marc@ufoseries. com> To: eSens@yahoogroups. com Sent: Tue, 26 January, 2010 18:22:41 Subject: Re: [eSens] About the QLink! > Marc, Why don't you try it again & see? Nothing to lose. I will, but only because I happen to have a Q-Link (SRT3) lying around in my garage... :-) I tried an earlier Q-Link (SRT-1?) many years ago, and it did virtually nothing for me. Marc [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] |
ground current in the floor of our homes is real.....
More on that soon.. On 2010-01-26, at 1:59 PM, Evie wrote: > Hi, Ole, > > I tried and liked going barefoot, too, but not in my own home. Going barefoot in my home causes me problems, which is also why I don't like to be grounded in bed there. If you are in an atmosphere where emfs are leaving your body, rather than entering it, I think grounding is wonderful. I personally don't like being in an atmosphere which causes the opposite, which isusually the case now in our homes. > > My 2 cents, for all that is worth, ;) > Diane > > --- On Tue, 1/26/10, Ole Alstrup <[hidden email]> wrote: > > From: Ole Alstrup <[hidden email]> > Subject: Re: [eSens] The Power of becoming Grounded > To: [hidden email] > Date: Tuesday, January 26, 2010, 1:34 PM > > > > I tested the barefoot method years ago and still find it refreshing and rejuvenating. Would like to sleep being grounded etc. There are several product brands available related to this. > > ____________ _________ _________ __ > From: Ole Alstrup <alstrup@yahoo. com> > To: eSens@yahoogroups. com > Sent: Tue, 26 January, 2010 19:20:22 > Subject: [eSens] The Power of becoming Grounded > > David Wolfe talking about the grounding method to combat ELF/EMF > > http://www.youtube. com/watch? v=o9h48cpn9Oo& feature=related > > Is his measuring method valid? He doesnt seem to recognize that devices can have a harmonizing effect. But I have read about this before and a friend who is a serious researcher/inventor has recommended it to me on > several occasions. > > Anyone here with experiences? Please share! > > ____________ _________ _________ __ > From: Marc Martin <marc@ufoseries. com> > To: eSens@yahoogroups. com > Sent: Tue, 26 January, 2010 18:22:41 > Subject: Re: [eSens] About the QLink! > > > Marc, Why don't you try it again & see? Nothing to lose. > > I will, but only because I happen to have a Q-Link (SRT3) lying > around in my garage... :-) > > I tried an earlier Q-Link (SRT-1?) many years ago, and it did > virtually nothing for me. > > Marc > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] |
In reply to this post by Loni Rosser
Hi Loni,
It is wonderful to hear how well you have done with the Q-link! I remember just last year you were having to sleep in your car! That has been a life changer for you. I am so glad you found something which helps so well. PS: I am trying to get caught up on my mail and I remember a long agodiscussion we had about my diet (I am gluten-free and sugar-free, etc) and you said it sounded as tho I was struggling with my diet. I didn't get to answer due to family health problems which arose over the Holidays. I just wanted you to know that I am not struggling with my diet or ems. I have been struggling with all that has been changing around me lately, re family illnesses and taking care of too many houses. I guess this is how it is with most families with elderly parents, but it really caught me off-guard. Wishing you continued success, Diane --- On Mon, 1/25/10, Loni <[hidden email]> wrote: From: Loni <[hidden email]> Subject: Re: [eSens] About the QLink! To: [hidden email] Date: Monday, January 25, 2010, 4:30 PM Regarding QLink: My friend told me about QLink & said "it's not that I see a huge difference when I wear it. It's that I feel a big difference when I'm not wearing it." I purchased the QLink with an open mind. I've tried a plethora of things that have not worked. To update anyone who doesn't know my story; I purchased a house close to about 8 cell antennas (2 towers) & for two years I had to go to a public gated desert park to sleep because I would just fry in the house. I purchased RF shielding from Germany for the windows that helped a great deal but to my disappointment I still couldn't sleep in the house. Until the QLink. To my surprise it has been a life saver. Have slept outdoors for 3 years & now I can sleep in my house. I am not turning the fridge off every day either like I was. Google the London video. You can return the thing if it doesn't work for you so you have nothing to lose. Someone emailed a whole list of celebs that are wearing the QLInk. I am probably one of the most sensitive people on the planet so there you go. I can't tell you how much I appreciate the little things in life now like just having a roof over my head. Being able to watch tv. Cooking dinner for my family. Being in the house with my kids. Not feeling as humiliated aboutwhat I had to do to protect myself. My Two Cents for what it's worth! Loni --- On Mon, 1/25/10, barbpom2000 <barbpom2000@ yahoo.com> wrote: From: barbpom2000 <barbpom2000@ yahoo.com> Subject: [eSens] I read something in the Links area To: eSens@yahoogroups. com Date: Monday, January 25, 2010, 1:35 PM Hi Everyone, I was reading in the links area a article called: A warning about EMF Protection Devices and Deceptive Advertising. I am sure many of youread it. It showed how many products just do not work in EMF reduction. After reading here, the importance of cell phone usage, turning off electrical appliances,etc. is reallly the only way to reduce EMF's. It also talked about the placibo effect some people have with certain products. I was concedering the Q-link, but Not anymore. I purchased 4 stetzers filter, and some of the Aulterra patches. After reading the article I am not sure if they really work, I guess my next purchase will have to be a meter. If I may ask, do any of you think any products really help, like the patches, Q-links, I even saw a video on You Tube, that you print out this page and the cut out a section which has all different colors on it will help withEMF, maybe called free EMF protection.. or something like that. That really got me thinking how many products could be and are a total waste of money. There is no easy fix or protection is there? There was another site, that had I think crystal you hang around your neck,which are very expensive. can you give me your favorite products if you use them or web site?? I read a phamplet from Aulterra, it looks so good for those patches. They say on it Can you afford to go without the BEST EMF protection money can buy? Well, if they really don't work. why buy it. [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] |
Administrator
|
In reply to this post by alstrup
> So what is it that Clarus keep making their devices better with?
Hmmm, I don't know... anyone here an expert on Clarus (Q-Link, etc.) products? I know we used to have someone on this list (Vinny Pinto) who seemed to have the "inside scoop" on how these products worked, but he left the list long ago. Something to do with "Intention Programming". I have heard from one person that there was a link between the Clarus products and those from Quantum Products, but frankly, they seem described differently enough on their websites that I'm not so sure that there is any commonality. And back in 2001, I had a huge reaction to something from Quantum Products, while at the same time having no reaction to something from Clarus. Marc |
In reply to this post by evie15422
This thread is really fascinating and it made me wonder about the beach. You said that emfs are drawn to high water concentrations and that the waterwould absorb emfs in the atmosphere. Could that be why a lot of us are more comfortable at the beach than any other place?? I go every weekend and if I could live there, I would. I feel SO much better there than other places. What do you think???
Amy ________________________________ From: Evie <[hidden email]> To: [hidden email] Sent: Tue, January 26, 2010 12:47:39 PM Subject: Re: [eSens] Re: I read something in the Links area Hi, Barb, Aloe is one of the plants referred to in the book I recommended for readingyesterday. The book includes NASA research on which plants clear which chemicals from the atmosphere. I don't remember whether emfs were addressed in the book, but we know generally speaking that emfs are drawn to high water concentrations. So, yes, aloe vera plants are high in water content andtherefore would likely absorb emfs in your atmosphere. I use plants near my windows to block emfs when necessary/possible. Plantsand trees are especially helpful for blocking out emfs from outside aroundyour house, but plants help me inside, too. It is possible (tho it would need research to prove) that emf "dirty air", as Charles here has pointed out exists in some circumstances, might be removed by using plants, as well. Best wishes, Diane --- On Mon, 1/25/10, barbpom2000 <[hidden email]> wrote: From: barbpom2000 <[hidden email]> Subject: [eSens] Re: I read something in the Links area To: [hidden email] Date: Monday, January 25, 2010, 7:26 PM Kooky, I have aloe vera plants, I have one bu my computer, I have a huge one that needs repotting, should I have these all over the house. How do theyprotect against EMF's? --- In eSens@yahoogroups. com, Kooky <furstc0404@ ...> wrote: > > > Diane > > Good point about plants, they have to be taken care of. Best to avoid chems. > > Concerning plants and radiation, there are quite a few papers by scientists about some plants, with the ability to "soak" up ES/EMS/RF > > Apparently, Aloe Vera is excelent for this, as well as others. > > Kooky > > > --- On Mon, 1/25/10, Evie <evie15422@. ..> wrote: > > From: Evie <evie15422@. ..> > Subject: Re: [eSens] I read something in the Links area > To: eSens@yahoogroups. com > Date: Monday, January 25, 2010, 6:04 PM > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi, Loni, > > > > I am mold sensitive. It is easy to take care of mold issues on plants. Every 6 months, just remove the top inch or 2 of soil and replace with clean potting soil. Also give the plants frequent soap baths--sponge them off with sudsy dish soapy water and then spray them clean. The soap kills almost any bugs which can thrive on plants. There is a great book on detoxifying your home with plants: “How to Grow Fresh Air: 50 Houseplants that Purify Your Home and Office” by Dr. BC Wolverton > > > > Good luck, > > Diane > > --- On Mon, 1/25/10, Loni <loni326@yahoo. com> wrote: > > > > From: Loni <loni326@yahoo. com> > > Subject: Re: [eSens] I read something in the Links area > > To: eSens@yahoogroups. com > > Date: Monday, January 25, 2010, 4:34 PM > > > > > > > > I really am strongly against house plants. They attract mold. An infectedspider plant infected my house & i can't be around plants. Most people over water house plants & they harbor lots of mold. Not good for EI's. Just myexperience. Loni > > > > --- On Mon, 1/25/10, Kooky <furstc0404@ yahoo. com> wrote: > > > > From: Kooky <furstc0404@ yahoo. com> > > Subject: Re: [eSens] I read something in the Links area > > To: eSens@yahoogroups. com > > Date: Monday, January 25, 2010, 1:58 PM > > > > > > > > I have a crystal near my screen PC and many plants around > > my apartment > > > > Some plants are known to absorb EMF/RF and adapt, as well as being protective, it is a natural and harmless air purifyer. > > > > IMHO, unless tech savvy, and even then, avoidance is cheapest and most effective. Preventing high level of free radicals by taking antioxidants, healthy diet, and healthy lifestly, may help too. > > > > --- On Mon, 1/25/10, barbpom2000 <barbpom2000@ yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > From: barbpom2000 <barbpom2000@ yahoo.com> > > Subject: [eSens] I read something in the Links area > > To: eSens@yahoogroups.. com > > Date: Monday, January 25, 2010, 3:35 PM > > > > > > > > Hi Everyone, I was reading in the links area a article called: A warning about EMF Protection Devices and Deceptive Advertising. I am sure many of you read it. It showed how many products just do not work in EMF reduction. After reading here, the importance of cell phone usage, turning off electrical appliances,etc. is reallly the only way to reduce EMF's. > > > > It also talked about the placibo effect some people have with certain products. I was concedering the Q-link, but Not anymore. I purchased 4 stetzers filter, and some of the Aulterra patches. After reading the article I am not sure if they really work, I guess my next purchase will have to be a meter. > > > > If I may ask, do any of you think any products really help, like the patches, Q-links, I even saw a video on You Tube, that you print out this page and the cut out a section which has all different colors on it will help with EMF, maybe called free EMF protection.. or something like that. That really got me thinking how many products could be and are a total waste of money. There is no easy fix or protection is there? > > > > There was another site, that had I think crystal you hang around your neck,which are very expensive. > > > > can you give me your favorite products if you use them or web site?? > > > > I read a phamplet from Aulterra, it looks so good for those patches. Theysay on it Can you afford to go without the BEST EMF protection money can buy? Well, if they really don't work. why buy it. > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > > > ____________ _________ _________ _________ _________ __ > > Do You Yahoo!? > > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around > > http://mail. yahoo.com > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > > > ____________ _________ _________ _________ _________ __ > > Do You Yahoo!? > > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around > > http://mail. yahoo.com > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] ------------------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Links [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] |
Administrator
|
> This thread is really fascinating and it made me wonder about the beach.
> You said that emfs are drawn to high water concentrations and that the > water would absorb emfs in the atmosphere. Could that be why a lot of us > are more comfortable at the beach than any other place?? It is said that beaches are good because of the high amount of negative ions in the air. Also, the fresh air can't hurt. :-) Also, cellphone towers aren't as likely to be near beaches, so that's another good thing. Marc |
Also, you are likely to be well grounded there (walking/sitting barefoot).
Emil ----- Original Message ----- From: "Marc Martin" <[hidden email]> To: <[hidden email]> Sent: Wednesday, January 27, 2010 11:03 AM Subject: Re: [eSens] Re: I read something in the Links area >> This thread is really fascinating and it made me wonder about the beach. >> You said that emfs are drawn to high water concentrations and that the >> water would absorb emfs in the atmosphere. Could that be why a lot of us >> are more comfortable at the beach than any other place?? > > It is said that beaches are good because of the high amount of negative > ions in the air. Also, the fresh air can't hurt. :-) Also, cellphone > towers aren't as likely to be near beaches, so that's another good thing. > > Marc > > > ------------------------------------ > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > |
Administrator
|
In reply to this post by Loni Rosser
> It's been about a month now sleeping in the house & it is sooooo
> nice. I may order another one just in case more is even better? > Worth a shot. Loni, you may also notice that there are other, more powerful Q-Link products, although they may not be as portable (or affordable!) as the pendant. In the old days there used to be the "Ally" and the "Clearwave Clock", but these are now discontinued. In their place are things like the USB-powered "Nimbus" and "Maximizer", plus there are various pieces of "Equilibrio" jewelry. So if you find the Q-Link pendant beneficial, it seems like you might find the stronger items useful as well. Here is a page which talks about the various products and also the difference between SRT-2 and SRT-3. From the description, I'd say that ES folks definitely want SRT-3. :-) (and the pendant I tried a decade ago that didn't seem to do much for me was the older SRT-2): http://www.qlinkproducts.com/Scripts/openExtra.asp?extra=136 As for Ole's question about a possible connection in the technology between these products and those from Quantum Products, I've been just reading about SRT, and must admit that the descriptions of SRT do sound pretty similar to what I've read about products from Quantum Products. For example: http://www.clarus.com/sympathetic_resonance_technology.htm However, the practical implementation of these two product lines seem quite different -- for example, the Clarus portable product requires no battery while the Quantum Products "Quantum Companion" requires an AA battery. Also the Quantum Companion costs about 3 times as much as a Q-Link pendant. Marc |
Marc, This is great info-you are terrific! I am having difficulty understanding the SRT technology. Could you put it in layman terms?
Also are there any other stronger products you might recommend I try? Equilibrio products are stronger do you think? Thanks Marc! Loni --- On Wed, 1/27/10, Marc Martin <[hidden email]> wrote: From: Marc Martin <[hidden email]> Subject: Re: [eSens] About the QLink! To: [hidden email] Date: Wednesday, January 27, 2010, 12:49 PM > It's been about a month now sleeping in the house & it is sooooo > nice. I may order another one just in case more is even better? > Worth a shot. Loni, you may also notice that there are other, more powerful Q-Link products, although they may not be as portable (or affordable!) as the pendant. In the old days there used to be the "Ally" and the "Clearwave Clock", but these are now discontinued. In their place are things like the USB-powered "Nimbus" and "Maximizer", plus there are various pieces of "Equilibrio" jewelry. So if you find the Q-Link pendant beneficial, it seems like you might find the stronger items useful as well. Here is a page which talks about the various products and also the difference between SRT-2 and SRT-3. From the description, I'd say that ES folks definitely want SRT-3. :-) (and the pendant I tried a decade ago that didn't seem to do much for me was the older SRT-2): http://www.qlinkpro ducts.com/ Scripts/openExtr a.asp?extra= 136 As for Ole's question about a possible connection in the technology between these products and those from Quantum Products, I've been just reading about SRT, and must admit that the descriptions of SRT do sound pretty similar to what I've read about products from Quantum Products. For example: http://www.clarus. com/sympathetic_ resonance_ technology. htm However, the practical implementation of these two product lines seem quite different -- for example, the Clarus portable product requires no battery while the Quantum Products "Quantum Companion" requires an AA battery. Also the Quantum Companion costs about 3 times as much as a Q-Link pendant. Marc [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] |
Administrator
|
> Marc, This is great info-you are terrific! I am having difficulty
> understanding the SRT technology. Could you put it in layman terms? It appears similar to the Quantum Products technology -- they are treating objects with some kind of master treatment device, and that makes the objects more "coherent", which affects people and things in their vicinity. Adding power to these objects makes the effect stronger, so I would think a USB-powered (5 volt) device would be stronger than the Q-Link pendant, which is I think is powered by ambient fields collected by the copper coil. (of course, I could be totally wrong -- it appears that there is a lot more information about Clarus products now than the last time I checked ago) > Also are there any other stronger products you might recommend I try? > Equilibrio products are stronger do you think? I would suspect the "Nimbus" would be stronger, and the "Optimizer" would be the strongest. I think the Equilibrio products may just be stylish, and may not even be as strong as the Q-Link, as they don't look like they have a copper coil. Also, if what they are doing is similar to Quantum Products, then two pendants *would* be stronger than one. Marc |
In reply to this post by barbpom2000
In a message dated 27/01/2010 16:41:41 GMT Standard Time, [hidden email] writes: It is said that beaches are good because of the high amount of negative > ions in the air. Also, the fresh air can't hurt. :-) Also, cellphone > towers aren't as likely to be near beaches, so that's another good thing. > > Marc Puk replies - as for cellphone mast and beaches Most of the popular beaches on the south coast are well coverd by cell masts unfortunately, and of course once the appeal of the landscape has worn off the average joe soap will start to twaddle around with thier mobile ! [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] |
In reply to this post by alstrup
Yes, grounding is easy and usually good thing to do.
But the person in this video makes various untrue statements about EMF, including that "grounding is the best protection again EMF exposure." Grounding is grounding. Grounding does not protect at all. If you are exposed to 500 mG magnetic field, your exposure remains 500 mG, regardless of whether you are grounded or not. Furthermore, grounding can INCREASE your electric field exposure, if the source of the field is on the opposite side of your body from the ground device. This does not show up by the simple testing he does, but will easily show up when tested with electric field meter. Finally, why is he touting his friend's "superior EMF protection device"? He goes on to say it does nothing at all. Aside from not making much sense, he surely doe snot understand the physics, nor the biology of electromagnetic fields. Emil ----- Original Message ----- From: "Ole Alstrup" <[hidden email]> To: <[hidden email]> Sent: Tuesday, January 26, 2010 1:20 PM Subject: [eSens] The Power of becoming Grounded > David Wolfe talking about the grounding method to combat ELF/EMF > > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o9h48cpn9Oo&feature=related > > Is his measuring method valid? He doesnt seem to recognize that devices > can have a harmonizing effect. But I have read about this before and a > friend who is a serious researcher/inventor has recommended it to me on > several occasions. > > Anyone here with experiences? Please share! > > > > > > ________________________________ > From: Marc Martin <[hidden email]> > To: [hidden email] > Sent: Tue, 26 January, 2010 18:22:41 > Subject: Re: [eSens] About the QLink! > > >> Marc, Why don't you try it again & see? Nothing to lose. > > I will, but only because I happen to have a Q-Link (SRT3) lying > around in my garage... :-) > > I tried an earlier Q-Link (SRT-1?) many years ago, and it did > virtually nothing for me. > > Marc > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > > > ------------------------------------ > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > |
Well said.
On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 1:59 PM, lessemf.com <[hidden email]> wrote: > > > Yes, grounding is easy and usually good thing to do. > But the person in this video makes various untrue statements about EMF, > including that "grounding is the best protection again EMF exposure." > > Grounding is grounding. Grounding does not protect at all. If you are > exposed to 500 mG magnetic field, your exposure remains 500 mG, regardless > of whether you are grounded or not. > > Furthermore, grounding can INCREASE your electric field exposure, if the > source of the field is on the opposite side of your body from the ground > device. This does not show up by the simple testing he does, but will > easily > show up when tested with electric field meter. > > Finally, why is he touting his friend's "superior EMF protection device"? > He > goes on to say it does nothing at all. > > Aside from not making much sense, he surely doe snot understand the > physics, > nor the biology of electromagnetic fields. > > Emil > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Ole Alstrup" <[hidden email] <alstrup%40yahoo.com>> > To: <[hidden email] <eSens%40yahoogroups.com>> > Sent: Tuesday, January 26, 2010 1:20 PM > Subject: [eSens] The Power of becoming Grounded > > > David Wolfe talking about the grounding method to combat ELF/EMF > > > > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o9h48cpn9Oo&feature=related > > > > Is his measuring method valid? He doesnt seem to recognize that devices > > can have a harmonizing effect. But I have read about this before and a > > friend who is a serious researcher/inventor has recommended it to me on > > several occasions. > > > > Anyone here with experiences? Please share! > > > > > > > > > > > > ________________________________ > > From: Marc Martin <[hidden email] <marc%40ufoseries.com>> > > To: [hidden email] <eSens%40yahoogroups.com> > > Sent: Tue, 26 January, 2010 18:22:41 > > Subject: Re: [eSens] About the QLink! > > > > > >> Marc, Why don't you try it again & see? Nothing to lose. > > > > I will, but only because I happen to have a Q-Link (SRT3) lying > > around in my garage... :-) > > > > I tried an earlier Q-Link (SRT-1?) many years ago, and it did > > virtually nothing for me. > > > > Marc > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------ > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] |
Thank you!
________________________________ From: Bill Bruno <[hidden email]> To: [hidden email] Sent: Mon, 1 February, 2010 22:34:34 Subject: Re: [eSens] The Power of becoming Grounded Well said. On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 1:59 PM, lessemf.com <[hidden email]> wrote: > > > Yes, grounding is easy and usually good thing to do. > But the person in this video makes various untrue statements about EMF, > including that "grounding is the best protection again EMF exposure." > > Grounding is grounding. Grounding does not protect at all. If you are > exposed to 500 mG magnetic field, your exposure remains 500 mG, regardless > of whether you are grounded or not. > > Furthermore, grounding can INCREASE your electric field exposure, if the > source of the field is on the opposite side of your body from the ground > device. This does not show up by the simple testing he does, but will > easily > show up when tested with electric field meter. > > Finally, why is he touting his friend's "superior EMF protection device"? > He > goes on to say it does nothing at all. > > Aside from not making much sense, he surely doe snot understand the > physics, > nor the biology of electromagnetic fields. > > Emil > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Ole Alstrup" <[hidden email] <alstrup%40yahoo.com>> > To: <[hidden email] <eSens%40yahoogroups.com>> > Sent: Tuesday, January 26, 2010 1:20 PM > Subject: [eSens] The Power of becoming Grounded > > > David Wolfe talking about the grounding method to combat ELF/EMF > > > > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o9h48cpn9Oo&feature=related > > > > Is his measuring method valid? He doesnt seem to recognize that devices > > can have a harmonizing effect. But I have read about this before and a > > friend who is a serious researcher/inventor has recommended it to me on > > several occasions. > > > > Anyone here with experiences? Please share! > > > > > > > > > > > > ________________________________ > > From: Marc Martin <[hidden email] <marc%40ufoseries.com>> > > To: [hidden email] <eSens%40yahoogroups.com> > > Sent: Tue, 26 January, 2010 18:22:41 > > Subject: Re: [eSens] About the QLink! > > > > > >> Marc, Why don't you try it again & see? Nothing to lose. > > > > I will, but only because I happen to have a Q-Link (SRT3) lying > > around in my garage... :-) > > > > I tried an earlier Q-Link (SRT-1?) many years ago, and it did > > virtually nothing for me. > > > > Marc > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------ > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] ------------------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Links [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |