High success rates with DNRS (Dynamic Neural Retraining System)

I've just started a course in DNRS (Dynamic Neural Retraining System)  https://retrainingthebrain.com
This brain retraining programme has a high success rate for people with ES and related conditions.  The on-line course costs $299 but the introduction and first lesson are available as a free trial.  I found that these, alone, were enough to point me in the right direction, although I am taking the rest of the course.

Has anyone else tried DNRS?

Does it have a high rate of success?  Seems like on the Facebook group, a lot of people report that it did nothing.

But I agree it does have *some* success.  Just maybe not a *high rate*.

Hi Marc

Thanks for your reply.  Perhaps I was over-stating the case a bit.

An independent study, carried out by McMasters University in Canada, showed a high success rate for chronic fatigue and multiple chemical sensitivity, among other things.  ES wasn't included in the study but it is frequently referred to during the course.  There are also interviews with participants who've successfully recovered from ES using the course.  I think that the basic mechanism (ie limbic system impairment) is the same for ES as it is for MCS and other intolerances.

I, personally, am aware that I make my symptoms worse by feeling anxious when I'm exposed to EMFs, or fear that I might be. I've already reduced much of this anxiety using the techniques taught on the course. I'm hopeful that this will reduce my ES.  At the very least, I feel happier and more relaxed.

hello Catherine and thank you for your post!
I heard that in order for the DNRS to work, you have to believe that EMFs are not harmful. I'm wondering if you or anyone else who's tried the DNRS program knows if that's true? That's what's kept me away from trying it.
If someone is chemically sensitive, I can logically accept that as true. For example, walking through the laundry detergent isle at the supermarket is certainly not great for your health but even if you walk down that isle every day for the rest of your life it's not going to do much harm. The same cannot be said for emf's. It's simply a fact that individuals have developed MS, cancers or other series issues from emf exposure. Emf's like 5G, cell phones, wifi give off radiation that is harmful. I could get myself to believe that a one-time exposure won't be fatal, but I can't logically accept the fact that emf's are harmless in the long term because it's simply not true.
Does the DNRS program require us to believe emfs cause no harm?

Hi, this is an interesting question.

Annie Hopper makes it clear that she is not suggesting that EMFs are not dangerous, nor is she saying that the symptoms of people who have ES are not real. However, she thinks that, in the case of people with ES, the limbic system in their brain has become over active and is exaggerating the danger posed by EMFs and sending exaggerated threat messages to their body.  The same is true of other intolerances such as chemical sensitivity.  I think she explains this in the Introduction to the course, or the first Pillar.  Both of these are available to view free of charge on her website.

I've only been doing the course for 2 weeks, but  I've already found it helpful.  I'm able to let go of most of my anxious thoughts around sources of EMFs by reminding myself that my brains is exaggerating the threat they pose to me.  I've got a long way to go yet - you need to practise DNRS for at least 6 months to see sustainable results, but I'm feeling hopeful.