Handy Fashions silver sheilding fabric

Classic

List

Threaded

13 messages Options

PUK

Handy Fashions silver sheilding fabric

Looked at website based on previous post advice, the following seems
a little worrying can we discuss the issues relating to sheildimg and
the apparent re-radiation. Does this not hop onto the person
chaotically etc could it cuase hotspots ???

see handy fashion statement from thier website below -

Keeping any product from handy-fashions.com between your skin and
your cellular phone, is the most effective protection against
microwaves - and it looks good too.

In addition, any product from handy-fashions.com will encrease the
reception of your cellular phone. You can test it yourself. If your
cellular phone is situated in an area with limited reception, you can
see this in the display. However, holding one of the products from
handy-fashions.com close to your cellular phone, will increase the
reception. After some seconds also this can be seen in the display.
Products from handy-fashions.com act as antenna. They collect the
signals on their surface and transfer them to the cellular phone
close by - without letting the signals penetrate the shielding.

regards Paul

PUK

Re: Handy Fashions silver sheilding fabric

What I meant to say was that it strikes me deflections etc are all a bit hit
and miss especially with a cap that does not fully encapsulate your head. I
think the only way on verifying this is to see a sort of scan in action
while person wears the hat and uses the mobile I understand that microwaves are
rather like water they can find their way around things

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

m.a.norman

Re: Handy Fashions silver sheilding fabric

This post was updated on .

CONTENTS DELETED

The author has deleted this message.

Andrew McAfee

remote targeting

Tell me more about this. I am not specifically sure what you are
referring to.
Andrew
On Jun 15, 2006, at 3:07 PM, m.a.norman wrote:

> I dont know if anyone has any thoughts on this, but I've actually
> wondered if it's possible to direct plasma or substance remotely,
> as another form of targetting ???

m.a.norman

Re: remote targeting

This post was updated on .

CONTENTS DELETED

The author has deleted this message.

Andrew McAfee

Re: remote targeting

I too feel a pain in my lower abdomen/intestinal area around
TV/Radio/Microwave towers which is lessoned by covering it by
shielding. I also feel pain in my teeth (and top of head which has
recently begun to have bumps and discoloration on that location) around
cell phones and other radiation even though I have removed all the
metal from my mouth.
I appreciate your explanation.

There is definitely something going on.

I am the first person to say there is a conspiracy.
I would like more info regarding the satellite targeting issue. I don't
know if it is a blanket of radiation beamed onto everything or more
specific to individuals.
I think that the chemical-mineral composition of our bodies plays an
important role in being susceptible to the effects of the radiation in
addition to the implants resonating directly with the frequencies.
For all the rest, welcome to the Twilight Zone.
Andrew

On Jun 15, 2006, at 6:48 PM, m.a.norman wrote:

> I've writeen about this before and it is this. I have an x-ray which I
> believe I posted to the photos section showing something that was put
> into
> one of my tooth roots unbeknown to myself. This I believe has caused
> me
> many problems.
>
> One of these has been damage to my face when at times it has appeared
> burned
> and the skin was scarred and damaged by what I believe to be some kind
> of
> targetting, that the implant is drawing to me. I say remote as this
> has
> been severe when I've been miles away from my home in the car, when
> the pain
> in my ovary area became so severe we had to stop to get painkillers
> from a
> garage. I put a metal can over it whilst I was waiting and the relief
> was
> almost immediate. At that time I had been getting severe pain there
> for
> some time and had what looked like two small red blood blisters on my
> groin
> area.
>
> To try and help myself I covered the back of a piece of carpet with
> several
> layers of aluminium foil and then taped over this with parcel tape to
> keep
> it intact. I would use this to cover myself with when I slept, or
> when this
> started. It did help, and I would hear whatever it is hitting
> against it.
> There have been many times when my face would vibrate and all the
> teeth that
> contained metal fillings broke. My face would be burned, and it
> damaged my
> facial skin badly. I had literally 4" of skin removed from my face.
>
> When my face first began to be burned I thought it was because of the
> incoming smoke and pollution that had been put into my home from the
> adjoining house. Now I understand better and believe that was part of
> a
> strategy used to hide the technology that has been/is being used.
>
> This is only part of a whole series of things I believe it to be
> experimentation, and it's been nothing less than torture. But, if I
> could
> do nothing about other problems that I had evidence and professional
> reports
> on, it stands to reason I'm going to get nowhere with these things
> that you
> cannot see but which are being used on people by neighbours and what I
> believe is satellite targetting.
>
> Maureen
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Andrew McAfee" <[hidden email]>
> To: <[hidden email]>
> Sent: Wednesday, June 14, 2006 10:35 PM
> Subject: [eSens] remote targeting
>
>
>> Tell me more about this. I am not specifically sure what you are
>> referring to.
>> Andrew
>> On Jun 15, 2006, at 3:07 PM, m.a.norman wrote:
>>
>>> I dont know if anyone has any thoughts on this, but I've actually
>>> wondered if it's possible to direct plasma or substance remotely,
>>> as another form of targetting ???
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Yahoo! Groups Links
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> No virus found in this incoming message.
>> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
>> Version: 7.1.394 / Virus Database: 268.8.4/363 - Release Date:
>> 13/06/06
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>

snoshoe_2

Re: remote targeting

This post was updated on .

In reply to this post by m.a.norman

Hi Maureen,

Sorry to hear your troubles are still ongoing. I can't really say,
but from the things I've run across, that pretty much any frequency
can be remotely directed.

I was just thinking, would you feel safe taking someone with you, and
going back to the dentist who implanted this chip, telling them it
bothers you and you want it out?

I'd sure still try and see another dentist to have it, or if need be,
the whole tooth pulled.
Even if things aren't targeted, it could be picking things up from
all over.

These rfids they are marketing all over can be read and hacked from I
think it is 100ft. I read, just by people wanting to steal the
numbers on them. Who knows what else they do already.

Have you ever had any abdominal surgery that one could've been stuck
in there too? It may just be a weak spot however.

~ Snoshoe

snoshoe_2

Re: remote targeting

This post was updated on .

In reply to this post by m.a.norman

Ligure

Re: remote targeting

In reply to this post by m.a.norman

So, I don't know about conspiracy theories here. (Although I have been
known to enjoy reading about them in the past ;-) ), but I can offer
one possibility for you to look into based upon my observation.

A few years ago we went to a dentist that used amalgams for fillings.
You know the mercury/lead/tin kind. Well it was my son's first filling
so I escorted him to help give him courage and I held his hand while
the dentist did the procedure. A little background on the dentist. He
is a very nice man and well intentioned. However, his hands had
tremmors in them. When I saw that a yellow flag went up for me. I
considered that it was probably due to all the times he had been
giving his patients amalgam fillings (and he would be the last to
agree with me about it then - though I did not bring it up at the
time). This dentists hands tremmored so much that the drilling was
larger than it needed to be and parts of the filling were falling off
into my son's mouth. My son would spit up the pieces that he could
retrieve before it went into his GI tract. I don't think he spit up
all them though. I felt so bad as a parent for my son.

Based upon watching that I never took my family back t othat dentist.
I found another that was amalgam free (an tremmor free). Recently that
same tooth on my son had to be pulled (four or five years after the
original procedure) because the filling was done so poorly that it got
a cavity underneath the amalgam. It was a baby tooth anyway and so I
was releived that he tooth was out. We could see that it was drilled
too deep and the amalgam deeply placed.

So I wonder if something similar to you happened. The amalgam was
placed too deeply into the tooth and a piece of the amalgam fell off
into your GI tract and embedded itself there. Now microwaves would
react with amalgams and that has been documented (somewhere). Getting
the tooth taken care of so there there is no more metal in your mouth
and trying to eliminate the embedded piece of metal in your abdomen
may help.

Anyway just a thought,

Rex

m.a.norman

Re: remote targeting

This post was updated on .

In reply to this post by snoshoe_2

CONTENTS DELETED

The author has deleted this message.

Marc Martin

Re: remote targeting

Administrator

> I wouldn't return to that dentist who did this during prolonged dental
> treatment when this thing was put covertly into my tooth root.

It is already established on the mercury poisoning groups that heavy
metal deposits can migrate to the root of the tooth or elsewhere. You're
going to have a hard time convincing anyone that something was purposely
implanted in your tooth when there is another more reasonable explanation.

Mercury poisoning can also cause paranoia.

Marc

m.a.norman

Re: remote targeting

This post was updated on .

CONTENTS DELETED

The author has deleted this message.

Marc Martin

Re: remote targeting

Administrator

> Have you seen the photograph of it in the photos section.
> Com on!

Yes, I have seen the photos, and that doesn't change
my opinion.

Also, this entire discussion seems to have nothing to
do with electrical hypersensitivity, so I will stop
now.

Marc