Fwd: Stop expansion of the city’s wireless ne

Very observant Bruno!
I spent $180 making books of the following articles:

Cell Phone Radiation Causing DNA Damage
http://www.rfsafe.com/ 
DNA_EFFECTS
.htm
1

Governments and Organizations that Ban or Warn Against Wireless  
Technology 2
http://emfjournal.com/cell-phone-ban/

Santini et al 2002, 2003 Symptom Graph Distance from Base Station
www.radiationresearch.org/.../
20061101_base_stations_health_concerns
.pdf 3

Evidence that Electromagnetic Radiation is Genotoxic
www.vws.org/documents/
7Dr
.CherryEvidence
.pdf 5

Electrosmog-What Price Convenience?
www.emrpolicy.org/review/
electrosmog
.pdf
8

Speech at SF City Hall Opposing City-wide WiFi Hotspot
www.antennafreeunion.org/
WiFi_Longwood
.pdf 10

Analysis of Health and Environmental Effects of Proposed SF Wi-Fi  
Network
www.vws.org/documents/
16DrMagdaHavas_WiFi51pgs_000.pdf Tab 1

Public Health Implications of Wireless Technologies
http://www.scribd.com/doc/13756250/Public-Health-Implications-of-Wireless-Technologies 
Tab 2

Health Effects Associated with Radio Frequency Radiation
www.weepinitiative.org/.../
Summary_of_Some_Pertinent_Studies
.pdf Tab 3

Expressions of Concern from Scientists, Physicians, Health Policy  
Experts
http://electromagnetichealth.org/quotes-from- 
experts/ Tab 4


Also emailed them this:


“Dr. Lai and Singh found double-strand DNA breaks…”Dr. Lai and Singh  
have shown that wireless radiation common to cell phones and Wi-Fi  
break DNA strands which is a cause for cancer and many other diseases.  
This radiation also opens up the blood-brain barrier and allows toxins  
to flow into the brain, and increases free radical damage to cells.  
See: http://www.rfsafe.com/DNA_EFFECTS.htm
Non-Thermal Effects: The FCC limit for public exposure from cellular  
telephones is based on a thermal heating rating called the SAR level  
(the Specific Absorption Rate is a measure of the amount of radio  
frequency energy absorbed by the body) and is 1.6 watts per kilogram  
(1.6 W/kg). Wireless radiation has been found to do damage to DNA far  
below the thermal heating level so the current laws/levels are not  
accurate in establishing a safe level of exposure. Several studies are  
showing that low-intensity radiation up to 200,000 times BELOW the  
safety standard cause biological effects. These include: DNA damage,  
leakage in the blood-brain barrier, lowered immunity, formation of  
micronuclei (biological marker for cancer), and others. Some  
scientists are calling for a new standard as the SAR measure proves to  
be inadequate. See: http://www.i-sis.org.uk/FOI3.php


Inside Research: Most of the telecom industry-sponsored research say  
the current levels are safe. There is one huge exception and that is  
the research done by Dr. Carlo who was asked by Motorola in the early  
90’s to research the health effects of cell phones. That $25 million  
project found there is much cause for concern (increased tumors,  
cancer, etc from cell phones) and the results were covered up.  
Independent studies on the risks show a clear cause and effect  
relationship between cell phone radiation and diminished health. See: http://www.emf-health.com/dr-george-carlo.htm

Sworn testimony of physicians, research scientists, engineers and  
attorneys in two recent Colorado court cases explain how federal  
policy in the United States is not protecting people from adverse  
health effects of RF radiation. The FCC’s Policy on Human Exposure to  
Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Fields does not protect against long-
term, low-intensity exposure.
http://www.emrpolicy.org/litigation/case_law/testimony1.htm

Columbia University Law School - Wireless Hazards Panel (video)
http://electromagnetichealth.org/electromagnetic-health-blog/columbia-university-law-school-wireless-hazards-panel/

YouTube Videos on Health Risks of WiFi, Cell Phones, etc.
http://www.youtube.com/view_play_list?p=FBB0B573B2634F08


Wired Child: Protecting Our Children from Wireless Technology
http://www.wiredchild.org/



GOVERNMENTS AND ORGANIZATIONS THAT BAN OR WARN AGAINST WIRELESS  
TECHNOLOGY



Expressions of Concern from Scientists, Physicians, Health Policy  
Experts & Others (Quotes...)



Public Health Implications of Wireless Technologies (Sage.pdf)



Summary of Some Pertinent Studies


On Jun 17, 2010, at 12:03 PM, Bill Bruno wrote:

> Wow! Great job. What are the materials you handed out?













[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]