Fwd: Re: anyone tried this polariser??

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
2 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Fwd: Re: anyone tried this polariser??

Marc Martin
Administrator
The message below looks like it was meant to be sent
to eSens...

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: anyone tried this polariser??
Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 12:23:26 -0700 (PDT)
From: Ellen Hellingwerf <[hidden email]>
To: Marc Martin <[hidden email]>

Hi,

Marc, thanks for sending me that, sure hope this one arrives!!

Came across another gadget from the company electromagnetic pullution
rectifiers (EPR). Read about it at http://www.bewisepolarize.com/ anyone
tried this one??


Love and Light

Ellen


*/Marc Martin <[hidden email]>/* wrote:



------------------------------------------------------------------------
Start your day with Yahoo! - make it your home page
<http://us.rd.yahoo.com/evt=34442/*http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs>

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Fwd: Re: anyone tried this polariser??

Marc Martin
Administrator
> Marc, thanks for sending me that, sure hope this one arrives!!

You're welcome -- hopefully it'll arrive, and we'll get a
2nd opinion on the Safe Space II.

> Came across another gadget from the company electromagnetic pullution
> rectifiers (EPR). Read about it at http://www.bewisepolarize.com/ anyone
> tried this one??

I've tried the pendants plus the larger model a couple years ago. At
the time, I thought they were pretty good, as they extended the time
I could spend in front of a computer and also be underneath florescent
lights. They also muscle-tested well when I took them to my health
practitioners. I used them daily for at least a year, maybe more.
One strange "side effect" they had on me was that they caused an
acne breakout underneath my eyes. For the first few months it was
under one eye, and then it transitioned to the other eye for the
next few months.

However, they had one feature that really annoyed me -- they got way
too strong for me when I was exposed to a large amount of radiation,
so much that the "cure was worse than the disease". Meanwhile,
when there was no EMF around, they did nothing. Now, this may sound
like a good thing in theory, but in practice it caused problems on
several occasions when I got into high-EMF environments.

I eventually replaced my usage of these polarizers with the Springlife
Polarizers, which oddly enough had the exact opposite usage -- the
more EMF I was around, the less effective they were, so I had to
use larger models in high-EMF environments, and smaller models in
low-EMF environments. At least this makes sense to me.

Linda Townsend at Bioharmonics.com has tested the polarizers at
BeWisePolarize.com, and she feels that they put out negative energy,
and that they amplify the negative energy in the environment. This
would explain why they seemingly behave in the opposite manner of
the Springlife Polarizers, which are claimed to put out positive energy.
She claims that the negative energy has the effect of suppressing
symptoms, and also makes people feel better if they are addicted
to negative energy.

Marc