Anyone can submit comments on the draft ADA regulations, especially
regarding equipment used in places that are supposed to be accessible to the disabled (including us). Begin forwarded message: *From: *[hidden email] *Date: *January 5, 2011 7:58:33 AM EST *To: *Digest Recipients < [hidden email]> *Subject: **Digest for [hidden email] - 7 Messages in 3 Topics* *Reply-To: *[hidden email] Today's Topic Summary Group: http://groups.google.com/group/americanassociationforcellphonesafety/topics - Call Today - Comment on Revisions to the Americans with Disabilities Act] <#12d56734a2f70a8d_group_thread_0> [1 Update] - a victory... now the real fight begins!<#12d56734a2f70a8d_group_thread_1>[3 Updates] - Please discard old link to paper...had to re-post with some typo corrections... <#12d56734a2f70a8d_group_thread_2> [3 Updates] Topic: Call Today - Comment on Revisions to the Americans with Disabilities Act]<http://groups.google.com/group/americanassociationforcellphonesafety/t/10d4fa2f1de6591d> <[hidden email]> Jan 04 07:52PM -0700 ^<#12d56734a2f70a8d_digest_top> Hello All, I made an appointment just now... If you're having trouble viewing this email, you may see it online. Share This: For Distribution: Topic Possibility of revising the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Regulations to address accessibility for the disabled to wireless technology and services. Take Action - Call 1-800-514-0301 to register to make oral comment at the United States Department of Justice (DOJ) ADA Hearing on January 10, 2011. Call as soon as possible as they encourage you to call 5 days in advance whether you intend to comment in person or by phone. Comment yourself and forward this information to folks you know with Implanted Medical Devices or who experience hypersensitivity to electromagnetic fields. ALTERNATIVE: Take Action - Submit written comment to the United States Department of Justice (DOJ) by January 24, 2011. Submit comment yourself or forward this information to folks you know with Implanted Medical Devices or who experience hypersensitivity to electromagnetic fields. TAKE ACTION Tell the DOJ in CRT Docket No. 110 (also RIN 1190-AA61) - related to web access - or in CRT Docket No. 113 (also RIN 1190-AA64) - related to equipment and furniture - how increasing wireless electromagnetic radiation has made and will make it more difficult for you to work, access services of State and Local Governments, and/or public accommodations by causing a disabling functional impairment for you or by rendering treatments for your disability ineffective due to electromagnetic interference. The DOJ Dockets address hearing, speech and vision disabilities. Your input is needed so that the DOJ includes the functional impairment brought on by environmental exposure to wireless devices in this proceeding. WHY? Unless we educate our government about the disabling functional impairment wireless communication can cause for those with radiofrequency sickness and medical implants, it may assume that making all libraries, public buildings, public spaces, shopping malls, hotels, motels, transportation services, etc., wireless will help all disabled Americans. The Disability Rights section of the DOJ is updating its rules for the ADA. It is studying how to help people who are disabled gain access to Web information, and to Services of State and Local Government Entities, and Public Accommodations that use wireless technology. It seeks input on how its rules on equipment and furniture need to be updated to improve accessibility for the disabled. See *** below for points to include. HOW? Call 1-800-514-0301 to register to comment orally at the United States Department of Justice (DOJ) ADA Hearing on January 10, 2011. Each speaker is allotted five minutes. You will be phoned ahead of your appointed time by DOJ staff. Additional information about the public hearing can be found at http://www.ada.gov/anprm2010/anprm_nov-jan_2010.htm The hearing is being held January 10, 2011, from 9:30 am to 4:00 pm, PST, at the San Francisco Marriott Marquis, 55 Fourth Street, San Francisco, CA 94103 Please support your oral comment with a written comment which can be submitted as follows: Submit comments, identified by RIN 1190-AA61 (or Docket ID No. 110) and RIN 1190-AA64 (or Docket ID No. 113), by any one of the following methods: Electronic: Link to the original docket related to websites and accessibility. Federal eRulemaking Web site: www.regulations.gov. Follow the Web site's instructions for submitting comments. Direct link: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/home.html#submitComment?R=0900006480b20b1a Regular US Mail: Disability Rights Section Civil Rights Division US Department of Justice PO Box 2885 Fairfax, VA 22031-0885 Overnight, courier, or hand delivery: Disability Rights Section Civil Rights Division US Department of Justice 1425 New York Avenue, NW Suite 4039 Washington, DC 20005. DEADLINE: Postmarked or filed electronically by January 24, 2011. ***Enough comments submitted on the topic of radiofrequency sickness as discussed below could have very positive results. Please read and participate. While access to the internet has tremendous potential value for people with disabilities, the Department of Justice needs to recognize that wireless technology emitting microwave radiation in workplaces, public buildings, places of public accommodation (government buildings, hospitals, doctor's offices, schools, airports, airplanes, buses, trains, restaurants, shopping malls, museums, etc), transportation, and other areas of American life is seriously limiting the ability of a growing segment of the American population to participate in civil society and community life. The DOJ Dockets address hearing, speech and vision disabilities. Your input is needed so that the DOJ includes the functional impairment brought on by environmental exposure to wireless devices in this proceeding. The microwave radiation from wireless technology causes serious functional impairment to many whose symptoms have been characterized under the name radiofrequency sickness. The symptoms can range from discomfort to life-threatening depending on the exposure and the individual involved. Please see Provocation Study using Heart Rate Variability Shows Radiation from 2.4 GHz Cordless Phone Affects Autonomic Nervous System (Eur. J. Oncol. Library, vol. 5) at http://electromagnetichealth.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/Havas_HRV_Ramazzini1.pdfto read about how potentially serious the effects can be on the heart. The ADA Dockets ask a number of questions related specifically to different aspects of website and physical accessibility. At the end of the Docket 110 - related to internet access is the question: " Are there additional issues or information not addressed by the Department's questions that are important for the Department to consider? Please provide as much detail as possible in your response." Docket 113 relates to furniture and equipment. WiFi deployed in a building, wireless inventory systems or communications systems, etc., would all constitute problematic furniture and equipment. Please submit your testimony under both dockets. Below are some points to consider and incorporate in your comments. Please be sure to personalize your comment with examples from your experience. You do not need to worry about providing a comprehensive summary of the science. The EMR Policy Institute will cover that in its comment. Points: DOJ should issue a supplemental NPRM (Notice of Proposed Rule Making) to explicitly address radiofrequency sickness and related environmentally-induced functional impairments. Accommodations for disabilities in hearing, speech and vision do not address all disability issues for emerging electronic technologies. Radiofrequency Sickness, a functional impairment which is caused by exposure to transmitted radiofrequency radiation and electrical pollution, needs to be clearly addressed by the DOJ in the rules governing Title I, Title II and Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act. ADA rules need to explicitly reflect the very serious nature of radiofrequency sickness and require that workplaces, public places and places of public accommodation provide internet access on wires or fiber optic cables only. (List examples of places you are excluded from due to your environmentally-induced functional impairment.) ADA rules also need to explicitly require utility companies to exempt persons with radiofrequency sickness from installation of transmitting utility meters at their homes and neighboring homes. Persons with relatives with radiofrequency sickness should be able to request this accommodation as well so that sufferers is able to visit and are not excluded from family life due to transmitting meters. Additional actions the DOJ should consider: The preemption of state and local authority over emissions from Personal Wireless Services Facilities found in Section 704 of the 1996 Telecommunications Act is an unreasonable restriction of the right to free speech and to redress of grievances and should be repealed. Persons with radiofrequency sickness need an entity where they can file complaints and that can and will take action on their behalf. Thus far, the Consumer Product Safety Commission, FDA, and FCC have refused to fulfill these roles. Radiofrequency radiation exposures increase risk of disease among the whole population and in the natural world. True safety regulations need to be enacted to protect the health of the public (including babies, children, pregnant women, the ill, persons with Implanted Medical Devices) and the environment during real-life daily exposures experienced from multiple real-life sources of wireless technology and electrically-polluting devices (see www.electricalpollution.com for more information). The EPA's efforts to do this were halted in the 1990s. It time for the EPA to complete this work. Under the current inadequate guidelines the number of people who are succumbing to radiofrequency sickness is rising daily. There should be a nationwide moratorium on additional antennas and additional wireless devices until true safety regulations are in place. Please try to make as many of these points as possible in the context of your personal experience. It is essential that a significant number of people file comments. We need numbers or we will be ignored so please pass this on to other affected individuals. The Department of Justice does have a history of listening where other agencies have not. Do help us and help yourself by filing a comment. If you are concerned about having personally-identifying information posted on the internet, please read the instructions in the dockets below for instructions on how to avoid that when filing your comment. http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/home.html#documentDetail?R=0900006480b20b1aLink to the DOJ docket related to websites and accessibility. http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/home.html#documentDetail?R=0900006480b20b7a Link to the DOJ docket related to furniture and equipment. PO Box 117 | Marshfield, VT 05658 US This email was sent to [hidden email]. To ensure that you continue receiving our emails, please add us to your address book or safe list. manage your preferences | opt out using TrueRemove Got this as a forward? Sign up to receive our future emails. Network for Good EmailNow powered by Emma No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com Version: 8.5.449 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/3356 - Release Date: 01/04/11 07:34:00 Topic: a victory... now the real fight begins!<http://groups.google.com/group/americanassociationforcellphonesafety/t/12500183d77b482f> "Elisa Boxer" <[hidden email]> Jan 04 07:12PM -0500 ^<#12d56734a2f70a8d_digest_top> Hi all... The good news from here in Maine is the PUC ruled to open an investigation into the technical and economic feasibility of allowing smart meter opt-outs. They are going to in vestigate whether central Maine Power's position on not allowing opt-outs is "unreasonable" (duh ;) ) It was really good news, because CMP had wanted them to toss out our complaint. The other piece of good news was that the PUC acknowledged the studies on BOTH sides of the RF issue, and the uncertainty, even though Commissioners said they were not taking up the health issue, just the choice issue. So moving forward, clearly CMP will bring out its hired guns to show why opt-outs would throw the entire system in to disarray, render it inoperable, and would jeapordize the entire federal grant from the Department of Energy, etc... So... does anyone know of any experts who could say otherwise? Who could show how opt-outs are reasonable and feasible both economically and technically? Thank you so much! And thanks for all your good energy... it really helped us today! Elisa <[hidden email]> Jan 04 06:01PM -0700 ^<#12d56734a2f70a8d_digest_top> Wow!!! Fantastic Elisa!! The choice issue os the way to go!! That is what we are doing with cell phones and also should be what we do with cell towers. There is no freedom of choice whatsoever. In the paper I recently sent out in the legal section, this could be a constitutional infringement on our rights if they take away our right to choose. You should call Cindy Sage and see if she has anything she can offer regarding the info you need. I will also make a call to an attorney I know. Very awesome. Some more awesome news...we have been making calls today to get people to co-sponsor the warning label in Oregon...I think it's a done deal on the Health Committee, where the bill will most likely be heard. We may have the majority we need to get it out of committee!!! I will know for sure very soon, but it looks like we have as either sponsors or co-sponsor, the majority of the committee!!! That is one hurdle...now we just need the majority of the senate and then the house...(uy givolt!!) ;) LOL it's only 43 votes total...It is do-able. I am probably going to Oregon next week to help David lobby. I will let you know what the attorney says. Awesome work Elisa!!! xo, Liz -------- Original Message -------- Subject: a victory... now the real fight begins! From: "Elisa Boxer" <[hidden email]> Date: Tue, January 04, 2011 4:12 pm To: <[hidden email]> Hi all... The good news from here in Maine is the PUC ruled to open an investigation into the technical and economic feasibility of allowing smart meter opt-outs. They are going to in vestigate whether central Maine Power's position on not allowing opt-outs is "unreasonable" (duh ;) ) It was really good news, because CMP had wanted them to toss out our complaint. The other piece of good news was that the PUC acknowledged the studies on BOTH sides of the RF issue, and the uncertainty, even though Commissioners said they were not taking up the health issue, just the choice issue. So moving forward, clearly CMP will bring out its hired guns to show why opt-outs would throw the entire system in to disarray, render it inoperable, and would jeapordize the entire federal grant from the Department of Energy, etc... So... does anyone know of any experts who could say otherwise? Who could show how opt-outs are reasonable and feasible both economically and technically? Thank you so much! And thanks for all your good energy... it really helped us today! Elisa "McPhee, John, DOH" <[hidden email]> Jan 05 01:47AM ^<#12d56734a2f70a8d_digest_top> Again, the principal question is why are we investing in wireless when the goal is underground fiber optics for all services to all residences and all businesses because it is many times faster, more secure, and far safer. That's our mantra, and when they cry about "expense", remind of the potential medical costs as consequences, the lawsuits, and the funding that could be redirected away from the defense budget to hire retired military who are currently unemployed......the defense budget this year is $719 Billion, or almost $2 Billion a DAY (not week). What are taxpayers receiving for that spending, as opposed to having the best telecommunications system in the world to attract business and create jobs, as well as creating jobs to create the system itself .....fight fire with fire......... Best of luck, and no need now for experts, just some LONG RANGE (not quick profit) planning!!!!! John From: [hidden email] [ mailto:[hidden email]<[hidden email]>] On Behalf Of Elisa Boxer Sent: Tuesday, January 04, 2011 5:13 PM To: [hidden email] Subject: a victory... now the real fight begins! Hi all... The good news from here in Maine is the PUC ruled to open an investigation into the technical and economic feasibility of allowing smart meter opt-outs. They are going to in vestigate whether central Maine Power's position on not allowing opt-outs is "unreasonable" (duh ;) ) It was really good news, because CMP had wanted them to toss out our complaint. The other piece of good news was that the PUC acknowledged the studies on BOTH sides of the RF issue, and the uncertainty, even though Commissioners said they were not taking up the health issue, just the choice issue. So moving forward, clearly CMP will bring out its hired guns to show why opt-outs would throw the entire system in to disarray, render it inoperable, and would jeapordize the entire federal grant from the Department of Energy, etc... So... does anyone know of any experts who could say otherwise? Who could show how opt-outs are reasonable and feasible both economically and technically? Thank you so much! And thanks for all your good energy... it really helped us today! Elisa Topic: Please discard old link to paper...had to re-post with some typo corrections...<http://groups.google.com/group/americanassociationforcellphonesafety/t/2f897c4721633077> "McPhee, John, DOH" <[hidden email]> Jan 04 04:11PM ^<#12d56734a2f70a8d_digest_top> Jim, This is a terrific article, and particularly the one line, as I am always looking for bullets, declaring that, to paraphrase, vendors should no longer drive the process of public safety. The other HUGE item that is coming on to the horizon, for everyone to consider, is why are the certified electricians denied the opportunity to hard wire infrastructure and buildings, or at least bid the process for evaluation of cost, if there is any question that wireless is unsafe? We are talking BILLIONS in business for the electricians, so given the virtual extinction of the new home business nationwide, the local electrical unions might be VERY willing to help us campaign for WIRED, not WIRELESS! John From: [hidden email] [ mailto:[hidden email]<[hidden email]>] On Behalf Of James R Johnson Sent: Wednesday, December 29, 2010 8:03 PM To: [hidden email] Subject: RE: Please discard old link to paper...had to re-post with some typo corrections... It is true underground is also better for Home Land Security since wireless fails easier in emergencies; a stronger argument to follow the models of others [Ref: Wireless Failures of NY on 9/11/01] http://www.nytimes.com/2010/09/07/business/07rescue.html There should be an agreement between HLS and EPA and FCC that at all times; underground is preferred. Jim ________________________________ From: [hidden email] [ mailto:[hidden email]<[hidden email]>] On Behalf Of McPhee, John, DOH Sent: Wednesday, December 29, 2010 10:16 AM To: [hidden email] Subject: RE: Please discard old link to paper...had to re-post with some typo corrections... Liz, With all the "electrosmog" you are already enduring in Santa Monica, etc., do whatever you can to get Shriver on board to block SMART METERS. Again, it is a MINIMUM of 5,700 emissions per day, not counting the "meshing effect", which may take each meter well over 10,000 emissions per day, and then, for you, in an apartment complex, the density of emissions from such a density of meters would simply be intolerable. The letter is what we came up with for an introduction to the issue. The major, major point in such a huge urban area such as yours, with 20 million people, is why bother with ANY electronic meters when it is far more cost effective and economically advantageous to install underground fiber optic Broadband, just as they are doing in Japan, Germany and so forth. It is much faster and more secure, as well as being so much safer for human exposure. Best of luck, John ________________________________ From: [hidden email] [ [hidden email]] on behalf of [hidden email] [[hidden email]] Sent: Wednesday, December 29, 2010 7:34 AM To: [hidden email] Subject: RE: Please discard old link to paper...had to re-post with some typo corrections... Thanks Kiku. I hope people can use it. And actually, I need to block smart meters here in SM. I have approached the County of LA abut warning labels on cell phones but this thing near my apartment is starting to take precedent. Smart meters haven't been installed yet. There is a political issue on my local Santa Monica council...we have an AT@T attorney on it. I spoke with Bobby Shriver who was interested in the warning label bill but I think he got some bounce back on that from the council. Anyway, will keep you guys posted and may reach out to you for some help with the smart meters/antenna tower stuff...I have no idea where this new antenna is. They never notified anyone. They just installed it. It is really powerful too. :( Liz -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Re: Please discard old link to paper...had to re-post with some typo corrections... From: K Iwata <[hidden email]< mailto:[hidden email]<[hidden email]> >> Date: Tue, December 28, 2010 2:18 pm To: [hidden email]< mailto:[hidden email]<[hidden email]> > I agree! Great(amazing) work, Liz, thank you, thank you, thank you. I hope you are able to locate the source of the distress at your apartment. Have smart meters recently been installed? Kiku Lani Iwata Burbank ACTION On Tue, Dec 28, 2010 at 10:10 AM, <[hidden email]< mailto:[hidden email]<[hidden email]>>> wrote: Thanks guys, and thanks so much for all that YOU do as well. I just hope it can be of use to people. I truly believe that if the awareness is raised amongst the general public we may have a chance at mitigating this stuff. Otherwise I see no end in sight!! I am sitting here wrapped in protective shielding. Something was installed near my apartment in Santa Monica and it is killing the greenery outside my door and doing things to me also!!! Scary stuff. Talk soon. Liz -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Re: Please discard old link to paper...had to re-post with some typo corrections... From: "Elisa Boxer" <[hidden email]<mailto:[hidden email]<[hidden email]> >> Date: Mon, December 27, 2010 5:49 pm To: <[hidden email]< mailto:[hidden email]<[hidden email]> >> I second John's motion. TREMENDOUS, Liz! You worked so hard on this and it shows. Thank you so much for all you do. Elisa ----- Original Message ----- From: "McPhee, John, DOH" <[hidden email]< mailto:[hidden email] <[hidden email]>>> To: <[hidden email]< mailto:[hidden email]<[hidden email]> >> Sent: Monday, December 27, 2010 7:05 PM Subject: RE: Please discard old link to paper...had to re-post with some typo corrections... Liz, Just AWESOME! What a great Christmas present! Thank you, John McPhee ________________________________________ From: [hidden email]< mailto:[hidden email]<[hidden email]> > [[hidden email]< mailto:[hidden email]<[hidden email]>>] on behalf of Liz [[hidden email]<mailto:[hidden email]<[hidden email]> >] Sent: Sunday, December 26, 2010 5:18 PM To: AmericanAssociationForCellPhoneSafety Subject: Please discard old link to paper...had to re-post with some typo corrections... Dearest Peeps, Please delete the last email I sent you and use this one for the link to the Non-Thermal paper!! It had some typos which Andrew and a few others were kind enough to send me notes on. I made the corrections and have re-posted the paper, so the old link won't work but this new one will. http://www.americanassociationforcellphonesafety.org/uploads/Non_Thermal_Paper_10-10_AAA.pdf I am utterly thrilled with the response the paper has received thus far...4 new people wanting to bring the legislation to their local council or state and it's only one day after Christmas!!! I look forward to working with anyone of you's out there who would like to bring a warning label bill to your city, county or state. I also look forward to continuing our work at the federal level very soon and to boning up on my own "how to fight a cell tower" skills. I have recently been bombarded with some "new and improved" infrastructure and am writing you this email swathed in shielding!!! The radiation has gotten awfully dense where I am living. I think I may have to move. Don't mean to bum you out on Christmas. I am having a jolly time besides being irradiated. LOL But seriously, I have brought this bill to my local LA County Board of Supervisors and may be in touch with some of you about how to get some o these antennas out of here!!! I hope you all are having a Wonderful holiday. To our success on this issue in 2011 and to all of you who work so tirelessly to make change on this incredibly difficult situation. I know how hard it is...but we will ultimately prevail. Lots of love, Liz= "James R Johnson" <[hidden email]> Jan 04 09:07AM -0800 ^<#12d56734a2f70a8d_digest_top> It is usually the case that in American Economy there are drivers; 70's Telecom, 80's computers, 90's Internet and 10's [conveniently] HLS/War. It stands to reason the next "big ap" is replacement of infrastructure using Military/Industrial Technology to keep Wall Street and economy going. Regardless the cost of human health, etc. The WTO tried to clear the EIR's but failed. Where's the WTO EIR's for Wireless? Since American technology is driven by oligarchies, it then stands that "technical committees" drive government and regulations for the NEXT BIG APP! These tech committees are representatives of all stake holders and usually tilted toward the money which is the corporations [a duh]. This "insanity" is driving American Assets off the cliff so I appreciate all of your work on sustainability and human balance. Seems practical; underground? They've been doing it for years and who wouldn't want to connect to a cable at their seat to replace WiFi? Now that you all are bringing to attention "EMF Pollution" I think the "front line implementers" [aka technicians] are standing and drawing the line as they'd rather work on things sustainable and stop with the salesmen who take the engineers ideas and rename, embellish, etc. to sell a pig in a poke. I'm glad you appreciate it; the next thing is to keep legislation going as well Federal Legal Actions in order to "compile" the evidence according to Science so the Judges can see and act clearly. Good luck and thanks for your work. Jim _____ From: [hidden email] [mailto:[hidden email]<[hidden email]>] On Behalf Of McPhee, John, DOH Sent: Tuesday, January 04, 2011 8:11 AM To: [hidden email] Subject: RE: Please discard old link to paper...had to re-post with some typo corrections... Jim, This is a terrific article, and particularly the one line, as I am always looking for bullets, declaring that, to paraphrase, vendors should no longer drive the process of public safety. The other HUGE item that is coming on to the horizon, for everyone to consider, is why are the certified electricians denied the opportunity to hard wire infrastructure and buildings, or at least bid the process for evaluation of cost, if there is any question that wireless is unsafe? We are talking BILLIONS in business for the electricians, so given the virtual extinction of the new home business nationwide, the local electrical unions might be VERY willing to help us campaign for WIRED, not WIRELESS! John From: [hidden email] [mailto:[hidden email]<[hidden email]>] On Behalf Of James R Johnson Sent: Wednesday, December 29, 2010 8:03 PM To: [hidden email] Subject: RE: Please discard old link to paper...had to re-post with some typo corrections... It is true underground is also better for Home Land Security since wireless fails easier in emergencies; a stronger argument to follow the models of others [Ref: Wireless Failures of NY on 9/11/01] http://www.nytimes.com/2010/09/07/business/07rescue.html There should be an agreement between HLS and EPA and FCC that at all times; underground is preferred. Jim _____ From: [hidden email] [mailto:[hidden email]<[hidden email]>] On Behalf Of McPhee, John, DOH Sent: Wednesday, December 29, 2010 10:16 AM To: [hidden email] Subject: RE: Please discard old link to paper...had to re-post with some typo corrections... Liz, With all the "electrosmog" you are already enduring in Santa Monica, etc., do whatever you can to get Shriver on board to block SMART METERS. Again, it is a MINIMUM of 5,700 emissions per day, not counting the "meshing effect", which may take each meter well over 10,000 emissions per day, and then, for you, in an apartment complex, the density of emissions from such a density of meters would simply be intolerable. The letter is what we came up with for an introduction to the issue. The major, major point in such a huge urban area such as yours, with 20 million people, is why bother with ANY electronic meters when it is far more cost effective and economically advantageous to install underground fiber optic Broadband, just as they are doing in Japan, Germany and so forth. It is much faster and more secure, as well as being so much safer for human exposure. Best of luck, John _____ From: [hidden email] [[hidden email]] on behalf of [hidden email] [[hidden email]] Sent: Wednesday, December 29, 2010 7:34 AM To: [hidden email] Subject: RE: Please discard old link to paper...had to re-post with some typo corrections... Thanks Kiku. I hope people can use it. And actually, I need to block smart meters here in SM. I have approached the County of LA abut warning labels on cell phones but this thing near my apartment is starting to take precedent. Smart meters haven't been installed yet. There is a political issue on my local Santa Monica council...we have an AT@T attorney on it. I spoke with Bobby Shriver who was interested in the warning label bill but I think he got some bounce back on that from the council. Anyway, will keep you guys posted and may reach out to you for some help with the smart meters/antenna tower stuff...I have no idea where this new antenna is. They never notified anyone. They just installed it. It is really powerful too. :( Liz -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Re: Please discard old link to paper...had to re-post with some typo corrections... From: K Iwata <[hidden email]> Date: Tue, December 28, 2010 2:18 pm To: [hidden email] I agree! Great(amazing) work, Liz, thank you, thank you, thank you. I hope you are able to locate the source of the distress at your apartment. Have smart meters recently been installed? Kiku Lani Iwata Burbank ACTION On Tue, Dec 28, 2010 at 10:10 AM, <[hidden email]> wrote: Thanks guys, and thanks so much for all that YOU do as well. I just hope it can be of use to people. I truly believe that if the awareness is raised amongst the general public we may have a chance at mitigating this stuff. Otherwise I see no end in sight!! I am sitting here wrapped in protective shielding. Something was installed near my apartment in Santa Monica and it is killing the greenery outside my door and doing things to me also!!! Scary stuff. Talk soon. Liz -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Re: Please discard old link to paper...had to re-post with some typo corrections... From: "Elisa Boxer" <[hidden email]> Date: Mon, December 27, 2010 5:49 pm To: <[hidden email]> I second John's motion. TREMENDOUS, Liz! You worked so hard on this and it shows. Thank you so much for all you do. Elisa ----- Original Message ----- From: "McPhee, John, DOH" <[hidden email]> To: <[hidden email]> Sent: Monday, December 27, 2010 7:05 PM Subject: RE: Please discard old link to paper...had to re-post with some typo corrections... Liz, Just AWESOME! What a great Christmas present! Thank you, John McPhee ________________________________________ From: [hidden email] [[hidden email]] on behalf of Liz [[hidden email]] Sent: Sunday, December 26, 2010 5:18 PM To: AmericanAssociationForCellPhoneSafety Subject: Please discard old link to paper...had to re-post with some typo corrections... Dearest Peeps, Please delete the last email I sent you and use this one for the link to the Non-Thermal paper!! It had some typos which Andrew and a few others were kind enough to send me notes on. I made the corrections and have re-posted the paper, so the old link won't work but this new one will. http://www.americanassociationforcellphonesafety.org/uploads/Non_Thermal_Pap er_10-10_AAA.pdf I am utterly thrilled with the response the paper has received thus far...4 new people wanting to bring the legislation to their local council or state and it's only one day after Christmas!!! I look forward to working with anyone of you's out there who would like to bring a warning label bill to your city, county or state. I also look forward to continuing our work at the federal level very soon and to boning up on my own "how to fight a cell tower" skills. I have recently been bombarded with some "new and improved" infrastructure and am writing you this email swathed in shielding!!! The radiation has gotten awfully dense where I am living. I think I may have to move. Don't mean to bum you out on Christmas. I am having a jolly time besides being irradiated. LOL But seriously, I have brought this bill to my local LA County Board of Supervisors and may be in touch with some of you about how to get some o these antennas out of here!!! I hope you all are having a Wonderful holiday. To our success on this issue in 2011 and to all of you who work so tirelessly to make change on this incredibly difficult situation. I know how hard it is...but we will ultimately prevail. Lots of love, Liz= "James R Johnson" <[hidden email]> Jan 04 09:24AM -0800 ^<#12d56734a2f70a8d_digest_top> Sorry EIR = Environmental Impact Report _____ From: [hidden email] [mailto:[hidden email]<[hidden email]>] On Behalf Of James R Johnson Sent: Tuesday, January 04, 2011 9:07 AM To: [hidden email] Subject: RE: Please discard old link to paper...had to re-post with some typo corrections... It is usually the case that in American Economy there are drivers; 70's Telecom, 80's computers, 90's Internet and 10's [conveniently] HLS/War. It stands to reason the next "big ap" is replacement of infrastructure using Military/Industrial Technology to keep Wall Street and economy going. Regardless the cost of human health, etc. The WTO tried to clear the EIR's but failed. Where's the WTO EIR's for Wireless? Since American technology is driven by oligarchies, it then stands that "technical committees" drive government and regulations for the NEXT BIG APP! These tech committees are representatives of all stake holders and usually tilted toward the money which is the corporations [a duh]. This "insanity" is driving American Assets off the cliff so I appreciate all of your work on sustainability and human balance. Seems practical; underground? They've been doing it for years and who wouldn't want to connect to a cable at their seat to replace WiFi? Now that you all are bringing to attention "EMF Pollution" I think the "front line implementers" [aka technicians] are standing and drawing the line as they'd rather work on things sustainable and stop with the salesmen who take the engineers ideas and rename, embellish, etc. to sell a pig in a poke. I'm glad you appreciate it; the next thing is to keep legislation going as well Federal Legal Actions in order to "compile" the evidence according to Science so the Judges can see and act clearly. Good luck and thanks for your work. Jim _____ From: [hidden email] [mailto:[hidden email]<[hidden email]>] On Behalf Of McPhee, John, DOH Sent: Tuesday, January 04, 2011 8:11 AM To: [hidden email] Subject: RE: Please discard old link to paper...had to re-post with some typo corrections... Jim, This is a terrific article, and particularly the one line, as I am always looking for bullets, declaring that, to paraphrase, vendors should no longer drive the process of public safety. The other HUGE item that is coming on to the horizon, for everyone to consider, is why are the certified electricians denied the opportunity to hard wire infrastructure and buildings, or at least bid the process for evaluation of cost, if there is any question that wireless is unsafe? We are talking BILLIONS in business for the electricians, so given the virtual extinction of the new home business nationwide, the local electrical unions might be VERY willing to help us campaign for WIRED, not WIRELESS! John From: [hidden email] [mailto:[hidden email]<[hidden email]>] On Behalf Of James R Johnson Sent: Wednesday, December 29, 2010 8:03 PM To: [hidden email] Subject: RE: Please discard old link to paper...had to re-post with some typo corrections... It is true underground is also better for Home Land Security since wireless fails easier in emergencies; a stronger argument to follow the models of others [Ref: Wireless Failures of NY on 9/11/01] http://www.nytimes.com/2010/09/07/business/07rescue.html There should be an agreement between HLS and EPA and FCC that at all times; underground is preferred. Jim _____ From: [hidden email] [mailto:[hidden email]<[hidden email]>] On Behalf Of McPhee, John, DOH Sent: Wednesday, December 29, 2010 10:16 AM To: [hidden email] Subject: RE: Please discard old link to paper...had to re-post with some typo corrections... Liz, With all the "electrosmog" you are already enduring in Santa Monica, etc., do whatever you can to get Shriver on board to block SMART METERS. Again, it is a MINIMUM of 5,700 emissions per day, not counting the "meshing effect", which may take each meter well over 10,000 emissions per day, and then, for you, in an apartment complex, the density of emissions from such a density of meters would simply be intolerable. The letter is what we came up with for an introduction to the issue. The major, major point in such a huge urban area such as yours, with 20 million people, is why bother with ANY electronic meters when it is far more cost effective and economically advantageous to install underground fiber optic Broadband, just as they are doing in Japan, Germany and so forth. It is much faster and more secure, as well as being so much safer for human exposure. Best of luck, John _____ From: [hidden email] [[hidden email]] on behalf of [hidden email] [[hidden email]] Sent: Wednesday, December 29, 2010 7:34 AM To: [hidden email] Subject: RE: Please discard old link to paper...had to re-post with some typo corrections... Thanks Kiku. I hope people can use it. And actually, I need to block smart meters here in SM. I have approached the County of LA abut warning labels on cell phones but this thing near my apartment is starting to take precedent. Smart meters haven't been installed yet. There is a political issue on my local Santa Monica council...we have an AT@T attorney on it. I spoke with Bobby Shriver who was interested in the warning label bill but I think he got some bounce back on that from the council. Anyway, will keep you guys posted and may reach out to you for some help with the smart meters/antenna tower stuff...I have no idea where this new antenna is. They never notified anyone. They just installed it. It is really powerful too. :( Liz -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Re: Please discard old link to paper...had to re-post with some typo corrections... From: K Iwata <[hidden email]> Date: Tue, December 28, 2010 2:18 pm To: [hidden email] I agree! Great(amazing) work, Liz, thank you, thank you, thank you. I hope you are able to locate the source of the distress at your apartment. Have smart meters recently been installed? Kiku Lani Iwata Burbank ACTION On Tue, Dec 28, 2010 at 10:10 AM, <[hidden email]> wrote: Thanks guys, and thanks so much for all that YOU do as well. I just hope it can be of use to people. I truly believe that if the awareness is raised amongst the general public we may have a chance at mitigating this stuff. Otherwise I see no end in sight!! I am sitting here wrapped in protective shielding. Something was installed near my apartment in Santa Monica and it is killing the greenery outside my door and doing things to me also!!! Scary stuff. Talk soon. Liz -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Re: Please discard old link to paper...had to re-post with some typo corrections... From: "Elisa Boxer" <[hidden email]> Date: Mon, December 27, 2010 5:49 pm To: <[hidden email]> I second John's motion. TREMENDOUS, Liz! You worked so hard on this and it shows. Thank you so much for all you do. Elisa ----- Original Message ----- From: "McPhee, John, DOH" <[hidden email]> To: <[hidden email]> Sent: Monday, December 27, 2010 7:05 PM Subject: RE: Please discard old link to paper...had to re-post with some typo corrections... Liz, Just AWESOME! What a great Christmas present! Thank you, John McPhee ________________________________________ From: [hidden email] [[hidden email]] on behalf of Liz [[hidden email]] Sent: Sunday, December 26, 2010 5:18 PM To: AmericanAssociationForCellPhoneSafety Subject: Please discard old link to paper...had to re-post with some typo corrections... Dearest Peeps, Please delete the last email I sent you and use this one for the link to the Non-Thermal paper!! It had some typos which Andrew and a few others were kind enough to send me notes on. I made the corrections and have re-posted the paper, so the old link won't work but this new one will. http://www.americanassociationforcellphonesafety.org/uploads/Non_Thermal_Pap er_10-10_AAA.pdf I am utterly thrilled with the response the paper has received thus far...4 new people wanting to bring the legislation to their local council or state and it's only one day after Christmas!!! I look forward to working with anyone of you's out there who would like to bring a warning label bill to your city, county or state. I also look forward to continuing our work at the federal level very soon and to boning up on my own "how to fight a cell tower" skills. I have recently been bombarded with some "new and improved" infrastructure and am writing you this email swathed in shielding!!! The radiation has gotten awfully dense where I am living. I think I may have to move. Don't mean to bum you out on Christmas. I am having a jolly time besides being irradiated. LOL But seriously, I have brought this bill to my local LA County Board of Supervisors and may be in touch with some of you about how to get some o these antennas out of here!!! I hope you all are having a Wonderful holiday. To our success on this issue in 2011 and to all of you who work so tirelessly to make change on this incredibly difficult situation. I know how hard it is...but we will ultimately prevail. Lots of love, Liz= Andrew McAfee Lecturer/Horn Instructor, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Music Director/Conductor Triangle Youth Ballet Former Principal Horn, North Carolina Symphony (1992-2007) 919.787.3022 (home) 919.962-2492 (office) [hidden email] www.hornlessons.org w [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] ------------------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/eSens/ <*> Your email settings: Individual Email | Traditional <*> To change settings online go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/eSens/join (Yahoo! ID required) <*> To change settings via email: [hidden email] [hidden email] <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [hidden email] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |