Fw: Stop Prof. Parks from Maryland University mockery of EHS disability & Arthur - Please respond

--- On Sun, 2/6/11, Dafna Tachover <[hidden email]> wrote:


From: Dafna Tachover <[hidden email]>
Subject: Stop Prof. Parks from Maryland University mockery of EHS disability & Arthur - Please respond
To: [hidden email], "amir borenstein" <[hidden email]>, "Iris Atzmon" <[hidden email]>, "pamela clemonts" <[hidden email]>, "Dr. Erica Mallery-Blythe" <[hidden email]>, "Andrea Boland" <[hidden email]>, [hidden email], "Bert Schou" <[hidden email]>, "Deborah Kopald" <[hidden email]>, "Diane Schou" <[hidden email]>, "McCarty, David" <[hidden email]>, "Angela Flynn" <[hidden email]>, "harvey katz" <[hidden email]>, "Magda Havas" <[hidden email]>, "Enrico Grani" <[hidden email]>, "Olle Johansson" <[hidden email]>, "Janet Newton" <[hidden email]>, "Marcin Leszczynski" <[hidden email]>, [hidden email], "Scott Killingsworth" <[hidden email]>
Date: Sunday, February 6, 2011, 6:54 PM


Hi All, 


Following is a link to a newsletter in which a Prof. Parks (not deserving of the title) from the University of Maryland is mocking Arthur &  Electromagnetic Sensitivity. 
http://bobpark.physics.umd.edu/previous_issue.html (January 28 issue). 


This is not the first time he has expressed his ignorant opinions on the topic on the University's Newsletter.


 Please send an email to the University expressing disgust by his words and the fact that the university is facilitating offensive behavior towards people with disabilities. (email addresses of university officials  are following). 


Please forward this email and ask your friends to write an email. 


University officials email addresses:


[hidden email], [hidden email]; [hidden email]; [hidden email]; [hidden email]; [hidden email]; [hidden email]


Thank you


Dafna


-


     

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Unfortunately, Bob Park is one of the best known
physicists alive today.  But he is mainly known for his
newsletter.  He created a title for himself at the American Physical
Society, and started a newsletter which he always signed
"opinions expressed here do not necessarily reflect those of
the A.P.S., but they should".

He mainly took popular stances such as criticizing government
waste or debunking mysticism.  But he also consistently said
that dangers from weak microwaves and powerlines are
impossible, though his argument, when he gives one, is that
one microwave photon has too low an energy to break a chemical
bond.  This argument is bad both because there are typically 100+
photons hitting a cell at once, and because biology often depends
on "non bonded" interactions.

He was trained in the Air Force radar school, and was in charge of radar
installation at Roswell AFB.  I have it from a reliable source that he does
not use a cell phone.  He says they are "annoying".

On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 3:59 PM, pamela clemonts <[hidden email]> wrote:


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



------------------------------------

Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/eSens/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/eSens/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    [hidden email]
    [hidden email]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [hidden email]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Well, if he was trained in radar he should know there are dangers to it. I have come across military docs. that give the side effects to those using ham radio over time, if I knew right where it was at the moment, I'd post the link. Their own info.

~ Snoshoe

--- In [hidden email], Bill Bruno <wbruno@...> wrote:

Hi Bill,
 
Thanks so much for your commentary.  You're awesome.  You know so much about all of this stuff. Do you work with Arthur Firstenberg's Cellular Phone Task Force? 
 
My friend Dafna who is an attorney who came down with this thing about 1.5 years ago. I came down about 3 years, but I feel it may have started earlier just not full blast.
 
I agree with Dafna on this one.  This man seems to be another arrogant scientist.  Their data these days makes no sense to me at all which proves to me that these so called "sciences" are too rife with ego to begin to deal with real issues.
 
If Mr. Park or Dr. Park, if applicable, will recall, only about 6-8 years ago did we hear that the human eye only sees about 4% of the physical matter in this universe-- meaning that we do not see at least 96%.  That simple fact alone leaves many potential holes in many a theory...and isn't it funny how these "realities" change all the time depending upon what new inroads or technologies allow us greater observation or insight.
 
I'm certainly no scientist or mathematician, but as you pointed out (100+...) doesn't 1+1 usually work in basic arithmatic?  Simple as I am, I would probably estimate that several tens of thousands of these radiating devices simultaneously emitting microwaves may actually cause some addition or multiplication of signals to cause innumerable fluctuations in the overall environment.  Not to mention that there are still many questions out on the relationship of these various technologies and our human systems.  Only time will tell, now.  But if this Bobh Park guy's such a trumped up physics star, then it behooves me that he could neglect to take time and frequency into consideration before making such absolute statements.  Has he sold out his scientific objectivity for a newsletter popularity contest?
 
Years from now, when the science of the day thwarts his lifelong efforts, then he will be perceived as another cog in the wheel of scientific understanding, then the ground will be levelled.
 
I hope you will take the time to address this man and some of his colleagues about the shortsightedness of their understanding.  I did include a sample of the eletter that I sent at Dafna's request.  Sadly, we have to spend so much time defending our position or our lives with EHS.  I'm glad that some of us are organized and trying to make things happen.  Please let Bob Park know how you feel.  Thank you sooo much. Have a great week!

--- On Mon, 2/7/11, Bill Bruno <[hidden email]> wrote:


From: Bill Bruno <[hidden email]>
Subject: Re: [eSens] Fw: Stop Prof. Parks from Maryland University mockery of EHS disability & Arthur - Please respond
To: [hidden email]
Date: Monday, February 7, 2011, 6:22 PM


Unfortunately, Bob Park is one of the best known
physicists alive today.  But he is mainly known for his
newsletter.  He created a title for himself at the American Physical
Society, and started a newsletter which he always signed
"opinions expressed here do not necessarily reflect those of
the A.P.S., but they should".

He mainly took popular stances such as criticizing government
waste or debunking mysticism.  But he also consistently said
that dangers from weak microwaves and powerlines are
impossible, though his argument, when he gives one, is that
one microwave photon has too low an energy to break a chemical
bond.  This argument is bad both because there are typically 100+
photons hitting a cell at once, and because biology often depends
on "non bonded" interactions.

He was trained in the Air Force radar school, and was in charge of radar
installation at Roswell AFB.  I have it from a reliable source that he does
not use a cell phone.  He says they are "annoying".

On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 3:59 PM, pamela clemonts <[hidden email]> wrote:


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



------------------------------------

Yahoo! Groups Links






     

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

 





Hi Snoshoe,
 
Thank ssooo much foryourinput.  Please email your sentiments to Bob Park and his colleagues. Their email addresses should appear at the  top of my original email.  I sent out about  8.  Bob Park's (master physicist) contact info is [hidden email].  You probably received a copy of the email I sent to them. You may think it's a bit stern, but I get so annoyed with these nonchalant over-educated idiots that never seem to make the world any better-- just their bank accounts and egos get fatter. 
 
I'm still P.O.'d over the major economists (over-educated...) who failed to see or inhibit the so-called economic downturn that has dessimated people's life work and may have crippled the monetary system permanently.  This telecommunications collusion will no doubt end just as poorly, now with people's families, careers and health being the main targets at this time.
 
Perhaps, I got too personal...Bt what is more personal than having to deal with people's belligerent ignorances each and everyday. I work in a hospital on the neurological unit.  You want to talk about frustration. 
 
Mr. Bob Park, he's tough, he can take it. So please take the time to tell him how you feel.  We have a world to inform. We have become the disenfranchised at this time.  Sadly, we've been called to rally on behalf of ourselves and our future world. We are the ones!  Have a good week my friend!
 
 
--- On Mon, 2/7/11, snoshoe_2 <[hidden email]> wrote:


From: snoshoe_2 <[hidden email]>
Subject: [eSens] Re: Fw: Stop Prof. Parks from Maryland University mockery of EHS disability & Arthur - Please respond
To: [hidden email]
Date: Monday, February 7, 2011, 11:32 PM


 



Well, if he was trained in radar he should know there are dangers to it. I have come across military docs. that give the side effects to those using ham radio over time, if I knew right where it was at the moment, I'd post the link. Their own info.

~ Snoshoe

--- In [hidden email], Bill Bruno <wbruno@...> wrote:








     

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]