Fw: [Rife] Undetectable Waves Detected

> Hola Folks!
>
> An intriguing story that evokes something I can't quite elucidate about
> 'phantom waves' but it will come to me eventually;
>
> http://www.livescience.com/technology/050614_baby_waves.html
>
> Undetectable Waves Detected - By Bjorn Carey
> LiveScience Staff Writer - posted: 14 June, 2005 9:42 am ET
>
> Scientists have detected the undetectable.
>
> Baby energy waves, once thought too small to detect, have been spotted
> by researchers.
>
> The children of solitary waves, baby waves technically shouldnt exist.
> The energy in a solitary wave moves in one compact spurt, like the
> shockwave that powers Newtons Pendulum, a popular desktop ornament. By
> definition, the energy in these waves is supposed to travel intact and
> not be broken easily.
>
> While baby energy waves have existed in theory since 2001, many
> scientists thought theyd never be spotted. Even the researcher who
> predicted their existence in the first place had his doubts.
>
> Surajit Sen, of the University of Buffalo, predicted that when a
> solitary wave hits a hard wall, it might break off a smaller, secondary
> wave of lesser energy. However, his computer simulations indicated that
> these baby waves would be too small to see.
>
> I didnt think they could be seen because theyre very small, Sen
> said. When he first theorized the existence of baby waves in 2001, he
> predicted they would contain far less than 0.1 percent of the parent
> waves original energy.
>
> Still, I hoped against hope that one might see them some day, Sen told
> LiveScience.
>
> Now, thanks to what Sen calls a very ingenious experiment by Francisco
> Melo of the University of Santiago in Chile, Sens wish has been
> answered. Baby waves, the offspring of solitary energy waves, have been
> detected.
>
> Melo handles the experimental end of Sens theories. He figured out that
> by making the the impact wall softer, the secondary waves would be
> bigger. He was right. The softer wall broke the initial solitary wave
> into larger baby waves  as large as 15 to 20 percent of the original
> energy.
>
> The initial wave can be generated very easily. Melo and his assistant,
> Stephane Job, set up what was basically a super-sized version of
> Newtons Pendulum, only without the strings. They lined up 20 steel
> balls against a wall of soft material. At the end of the line furthest
> from the wall, they rolled one ball into the first in line, which
> created a shockwave that ran through the entire set and bounced back off
> the wall.
>
> One of the balls  as well as the wall  had a sensor built into it. The
> sensor recorded the energy of the initial wave. But on the return trip,
> two waves passed the sensor. One was the initial wave bouncing off the
> wall  now with slightly less energy  and the other was the baby wave,
> which had broken off the initial wave when it impacted the wall.
>
> The detection is a step towards something fancy, Sen said. When you
> put a shockwave through a system, you dont necessarily think that the
> system will reach an equilibrium-like state.
>
> In a closed system, with a wall at each end of the line of balls, baby
> waves would form continuously. Even baby waves would make their own
> babies, although they would be very small. Eventually, the system would
> reach an equilibrium-like state with the energy from the initial wave
> spread nearly evenly throughout the system.
>
> This is due to the baby waves. Because you have waves of all different
> sizes in the system, youll have a system near equilibrium, Sen said.
> As far as I know, this is the first time that anyone has conjectured
> the existence of this state.
>
> These findings were published recently in the online version of the
> journal Physical Review Letters.
> --
> Jerry Decker - http://www.keelynet.com