Fw: Re: [eSens] Metal objects

Well these words are really one in the same. Because when you react, you feel it in your body. So both words are correct. I go near a cell antenna & Iimmediately react/feel the radiation being put forth. If I am under significant power lines I immediately react/feel the EF being emitted. When my skin burns/stings it is a reaction to it that I feel!!!!!!
 
Loni

--- On Wed, 10/7/09, [hidden email] <[hidden email]> wrote:


From: [hidden email] <[hidden email]>
Subject: Re: [eSens] Metal objects
To: [hidden email]
Date: Wednesday, October 7, 2009, 10:11 AM


 




In a message dated 07/10/2009 17:57:52 GMT Daylight Time,
charles@milieuziekt es.be writes:

No, Paul still refuses to accept the truth.

A hundred studies have*scientifically A hundred studies have*scientifi

There is only an immediate or delayed reaction in the body.

Paul uk replies - so what you are getting at is that you feel the symptoms
due to exposure, but is the symptoms are so immediate ie, in the presence
of a provocative device such as certain mobiles how can you tell that the
body is not sensing these in that instant, surely that is as good as feeling
? As for the delayed reaction this is a complex issue due to a myriad of
cascading factors. Still the effect is there wether you feel it or not,
obviously the 100 studies must be analysed in themselves,

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]


















     

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

> Well these words are really one in the same. Because when you react, you
> feel it in your body. So both words are correct.

I think Charles' point is that you don't really "feel" the EMF itself,
but rather the EMF causes some sort of reaction in your body, and what
you feel is the reaction (or the results of the reaction). So your
symptoms are an indirect result of the EMF exposure.

Perhaps a discussion best left for lawyers... :-)

Marc

I think that makes sense & we would all agree with that. Glad we got that cleared up! Ha
Loni

--- On Wed, 10/7/09, Marc Martin <[hidden email]> wrote:


From: Marc Martin <[hidden email]>
Subject: Re: Fw: Re: [eSens] Metal objects
To: [hidden email]
Date: Wednesday, October 7, 2009, 1:44 PM


 



> Well these words are really one in the same. Because when you react, you
> feel it in your body. So both words are correct.

I think Charles' point is that you don't really "feel" the EMF itself,
but rather the EMF causes some sort of reaction in your body, and what
you feel is the reaction (or the results of the reaction). So your
symptoms are an indirect result of the EMF exposure.

Perhaps a discussion best left for lawyers... :-)

Marc
















     

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Hi all,

I seem to recall that someone here tried a polarizing screen
filter on their computer monitor, and had a reduction of ES
symptoms from doing this. I realize that such a filter is
not reducing EMF, but if it reduces symptoms for some it is
certainly worth suggesting for some people.

Anyone else experience benefits (or no difference) from using
a polarizing screen filter?

Thanks!

Marc

There used to be a lot of electric-field blocking filters you
could put in front of a screen. I have some somewhere.
They aren't very conductive, but they can block ELF
e-fields if grounded, and with the old CRTs those fields
were big. I think the E-fields from LCD screens are
pretty small at ELF frequencies, but there might be
exceptions.


On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 3:46 PM, Marc Martin <[hidden email]> wrote:


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

LOL Marc,
 
(re the lawyers).  Yes, that is what I understood Charles saying too.  I am not sure whether science is advanced enough to definitively know this (I agree with what Jennie said), but I understand the concept.  Maybe "feel", as in the sense of touch, is the same--a reaction to another reaction!  (Kind of kidding here.)  Or maybe, as I have read, our burning skinis a type of neuropathy.  I view it as an exercise in splitting hairs since I am not sure the science to understand this exists.
 
Diane

--- On Wed, 10/7/09, Marc Martin <[hidden email]> wrote:


From: Marc Martin <[hidden email]>
Subject: Re: Fw: Re: [eSens] Metal objects
To: [hidden email]
Date: Wednesday, October 7, 2009, 4:44 PM


 



> Well these words are really one in the same. Because when you react, you
> feel it in your body. So both words are correct.

I think Charles' point is that you don't really "feel" the EMF itself,
but rather the EMF causes some sort of reaction in your body, and what
you feel is the reaction (or the results of the reaction). So your
symptoms are an indirect result of the EMF exposure.

Perhaps a discussion best left for lawyers... :-)

Marc
















     

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]