I'm wondering if there any sort of ferrite protective device vs. WI-FI..
Though maybe if the laptop where you're working is positioned several feet away from the router, such protection wouldn't be needed.. I've zero experience with the above, and haven't found info anywhere which discusses these points. Minni
Electrostatically Yours,
Minni, Lysine4flu blog |
Hmm, I'm not quite sure what you're getting at; I mean, with WiFi, the issue is the radiated signal. Ferrites are used on cables, to prevent conducted emissions from traveling along them (am I correct, everyone?).
That being said, I have seen some ferrites made specifically for the 2.4-ish Ghz WiFi frequencies. But wouldn't it make more sense not to use WiFi, or to shield the WiFi router itself in a cage/box or wrap the antennas in something conductive? (Sorry if I'm jumping into another thread related to something else.) R. --- On Wed, 12/30/09, minnimall <[hidden email]> wrote: From: minnimall <[hidden email]> Subject: [eSens] Ferrite vs. WI-FI? To: [hidden email] Received: Wednesday, December 30, 2009, 7:00 AM I'm wondering if there any sort of ferrite protective device vs. WI-FI.. Though maybe if the laptop where you're working is positioned several feet away from the router, such protection wouldn't be needed.. I've zero experience with the above, and haven't found info anywhere which discusses these points. Minni __________________________________________________________________ Looking for the perfect gift? Give the gift of Flickr! http://www.flickr.com/gift/ [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] |
Yes ferrite bead and torroids among others are mostly used to suppress RF on cables, but they also make ferrite sheets.
Even at several feet away youll be geting exposed to the radiation from thewi-fi, remember that wifi units can extend their signal far, plus at closedistances youll also be getting the RFI/EMI and AC electrical radiation from the unit itself on top of the actual rf from the wi-fi signal. |
It may not be what the original post had in mind, but
if you're in a situation where the wireless transmission is well shielded (neighbor with shared transformer, with high metal fence or adobe wall in between) then possibly the dominant source of Wi-Fi is through the wires. (I think at those frequencies the common mode will die out very quick, but if there are widely separated wires or current loops you can get differential mode coupling, and this could travel fairly far?). Most ferrites are not rated above 1GHz I think, but if you can get some 2.4GHz ones it might help. HOWEVER, I've read that ferrites generally saturate (become useless) above 5 amps of current (at any frequency) in the wire. That means putting it on your service wires (if you can get them that big) is a waste unless your power is off (or you're using less than 600 watts). The obvious place to put one is on the neighbor's router and computer power cords, but again if there are wiring errors there may be transmission from wireless to wire (luckily this should be easy to filter because of the high impedance; but the filter has to have a high quality capacitor with low inductance--i.e. short-- leads). If you can measure an increase in Wi-Fi at your phone then put the ferrites on each of your phone wires. But probably more often the problem is from the airborne Wi-Fi. Bill On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 7:35 PM, cris_aov <[hidden email]> wrote: > > > Yes ferrite bead and torroids among others are mostly used to suppress RF > on cables, but they also make ferrite sheets. > > Even at several feet away youll be geting exposed to the radiation from the > wi-fi, remember that wifi units can extend their signal far, plus at close > distances youll also be getting the RFI/EMI and AC electrical radiation from > the unit itself on top of the actual rf from the wi-fi signal. > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |