Could wireless affect air quality?

I believe I've noticed that in areas where cellular phone reception is good it seems to me that the air is less breathable, perhaps dirtier, & more likely to hold allergans, particularly mold than air where any cellular towers are several miles away.
I don't think this is just my imagination but I wondered if anyone else might have noticed this.
from what little I know about air quality, it's my understanding that clean fresh air holds a lot more negative ions that can combine with dirt, dust, and allergans such as mold spores so that these things that foul the air will drop to the ground & the air will remain clean.
I wonder if some of the artificially created electrical frequencies now in the air may react with & strip the air of it's negative ions so that the air loses it's ability to clean itself & becomes prematurely saturated with dirt, pollutants, & allergans.
I remember when I was a child that after a thunderstorm the air seemed clear, & fresh where now I can't really notice much difference in air quality after a storm.
I'd like to go one step further & suggest that if it's true that wireless frequencies can in fact influence the electrical charge of the air, it's also possible that it could also influence actual weather patterns.
I could be completely full of shit on all this but if it were true, it should be a very easy thing to verify by simply comparing suspended particulate measurements in areas where the air is saturated with wireless frequencies to areas where no cellular coverage yet existed.
If there was a definite difference in air quality figures, this in itself could go a long way in doing away with this horrible health hazard that's made so many of us feel like we were born on the wrong planet & have to look for artificial means to try & protect our health.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Hello,

normally in ancient times, we had some 2000-4000 negative air ions per cm3.

Nowadays we only have some 300-400.

Somebody measured the amount at 300 meters from a mobile phone transmitter
and than 60 meters away.
The amount was there 50 %

The same was done with a mobile phone.
First at a distance of 1 meter, and than at a distance of 15 cm; 50 5 was
lost.

And the same goes for a DECT phone.

Last summer I measured in the park in front of a building: 360 negative air
ions per cm3.
I then went up to the topfloor, where transmitters ware in place.
I could only measure 80 negative air ions per cm3.

So the high frequency signals kill our necessary negative air ions.

Greetings,
Charles Claessens
member Verband Baubiologie
www.milieuziektes.nl
www.hetbitje.nl
checked by Norton Antivirus


----- Original Message -----
From: "john" <[hidden email]>
To: <[hidden email]>
Sent: Monday, October 18, 2004 02:29
Subject: [eSens] Could wireless affect air quality?


>
> I believe I've noticed that in areas where cellular phone reception is
good it seems to me that the air is less breathable, perhaps dirtier, & more
likely to hold allergans, particularly mold than air where any cellular
towers are several miles away.
> I don't think this is just my imagination but I wondered if anyone else
might have noticed this.
> From what little I know about air quality, it's my understanding that
clean fresh air holds a lot more negative ions that can combine with dirt,
dust, and allergans such as mold spores so that these things that foul the
air will drop to the ground & the air will remain clean.
> I wonder if some of the artificially created electrical frequencies now
in the air may react with & strip the air of it's negative ions so that the
air loses it's ability to clean itself & becomes prematurely saturated with
dirt, pollutants, & allergans.
> I remember when I was a child that after a thunderstorm the air seemed
clear, & fresh where now I can't really notice much difference in air
quality after a storm.
> I'd like to go one step further & suggest that if it's true that
wireless frequencies can in fact influence the electrical charge of the air,
it's also possible that it could also influence actual weather patterns.
> I could be completely full of shit on all this but if it were true, it
should be a very easy thing to verify by simply comparing suspended
particulate measurements in areas where the air is saturated with wireless
frequencies to areas where no cellular coverage yet existed.
> If there was a definite difference in air quality figures, this in
itself could go a long way in doing away with this horrible health hazard
that's made so many of us feel like we were born on the wrong planet & have
to look for artificial means to try & protect our health.

Wow! That really explains a lot. What sort of device do you use to take such measurements? How much does it cost?
The weather service or even the EPA doesn't really pay much attention to negative ion levels do they? I'd think that this and suspended particulate measurements should really be a concrete cause for concern & a good reason for government agencies to at least acknowledge a possibility of harmful environmental effects, wouldn't you?
Do you know whether leading researchers into hazards of wireless are aware of &/or investigating this aspect of the danger?

----- Original Message -----
From: Charles
To: [hidden email]
Sent: Monday, October 18, 2004 4:31 AM
Subject: Re: [eSens] Could wireless affect air quality?


Hello,

normally in ancient times, we had some 2000-4000 negative air ions per cm3.

Nowadays we only have some 300-400.

Somebody measured the amount at 300 meters from a mobile phone transmitter
and than 60 meters away.
The amount was there 50 %

The same was done with a mobile phone.
First at a distance of 1 meter, and than at a distance of 15 cm; 50 5 was
lost.

And the same goes for a DECT phone.

Last summer I measured in the park in front of a building: 360 negative air
ions per cm3.
I then went up to the topfloor, where transmitters ware in place.
I could only measure 80 negative air ions per cm3.

So the high frequency signals kill our necessary negative air ions.

Greetings,
Charles Claessens
member Verband Baubiologie
www.milieuziektes.nl
www.hetbitje.nl
checked by Norton Antivirus


----- Original Message -----
From: "john" <[hidden email]>
To: <[hidden email]>
Sent: Monday, October 18, 2004 02:29
Subject: [eSens] Could wireless affect air quality?


>
> I believe I've noticed that in areas where cellular phone reception is
good it seems to me that the air is less breathable, perhaps dirtier, & more
likely to hold allergans, particularly mold than air where any cellular
towers are several miles away.
> I don't think this is just my imagination but I wondered if anyone else
might have noticed this.
> From what little I know about air quality, it's my understanding that
clean fresh air holds a lot more negative ions that can combine with dirt,
dust, and allergans such as mold spores so that these things that foul the
air will drop to the ground & the air will remain clean.
> I wonder if some of the artificially created electrical frequencies now
in the air may react with & strip the air of it's negative ions so that the
air loses it's ability to clean itself & becomes prematurely saturated with
dirt, pollutants, & allergans.
> I remember when I was a child that after a thunderstorm the air seemed
clear, & fresh where now I can't really notice much difference in air
quality after a storm.
> I'd like to go one step further & suggest that if it's true that
wireless frequencies can in fact influence the electrical charge of the air,
it's also possible that it could also influence actual weather patterns.
> I could be completely full of shit on all this but if it were true, it
should be a very easy thing to verify by simply comparing suspended
particulate measurements in areas where the air is saturated with wireless
frequencies to areas where no cellular coverage yet existed.
> If there was a definite difference in air quality figures, this in
itself could go a long way in doing away with this horrible health hazard
that's made so many of us feel like we were born on the wrong planet & have
to look for artificial means to try & protect our health.


Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
ADVERTISEMENT





------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links

a.. To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/eSens/

b.. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[hidden email]

c.. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]