That is a bummer.
The LED bulbs I was referring to, are here on Ebay: http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&category=16037&item=320072054014 I guess I shouldn't be surprised they are not all of a similar design. Stewart Marc Martin wrote: >> They DO put out radiation, and make me everybit as ill as compact >> fluorescents and sometimes more so than the regular ones. >> > > Still, they are completely different technology than compact > florescent bulbs, and we've already noted that they have different > characteristics when taking meter readings, and at least some > people here do not react to them when they did react to > compact florescents. > > Also, it appears from recent postings that it may make a difference > in who manufactures the bulb, as differences in the electronics > driving the LEDs may be the difference between having symptoms > and not. (I suppose people should state who the manufacturer > is when saying that they do or do not have symptoms from a > particular LED bulb) > > Marc > |
Before you get too bummed, realize that what Shoeshoe is pointing out
may or may not be an issue for you, and what she is calling "fluorescent" is dramatically different in concept and operation from the flourescent lamps you are familiar with. Regular (tube-style) and compact fluorescent bulbs are mercury vapor discharge lamps with a phosphorescent powder coating on the inside of the glass. There are numerous things about most fluorescent bulbs that cause radiated electromagnetic fields. - the electrical discharge itself through the long bulb - the electronic ballast (now usually switching-style) which generates a lot of "electrical noise" - RF noise generated by the arc inside the bulb - magnetic field radiated by the transformers in the ballast circuitry - in addition to these sources of EMFs, most fluorescent lamps "flicker" rapidly NONE of these applies to LEDs. Assuming a manufacturer doesn't "mess it up" by using a switch-mode or transformer power conversion circuit, there is NO measurable electromagnetic field (EMF) from an LED other than the spectrum of the light itself. What shoeshoe is pointing out is that some LEDs (and ones likely to be found in white colored LEDs) use phosphors which absorb and re- radiate the light from the LED junction at a different wavelength in order to produce a more pleasing color of light. It is this use of phosphors that I assume she is calling "fluorescent". Shoeshoe, please correct me if I'm wrong about your meaning. This use of phosphors in LEDs does not in any way change the LEDs to output a higher electric or magnetic field, but it does produce a different "light spectrum". Some people (like Shoeshoe) are apparently sensitive to the spectra produced by phosphorescent materials, and have a reaction to them. This certainly doesn't appear to apply to everyone that is ES, and maybe not even to most -- as far as I can tell, I am sensitive to the EMF field and noise produced by the ballast and discharge of typical fluorescent lamps, but although I find some of the spectra of some LED lamps "not pleasing", I can't detect any electrical sensitivity to the fluorescent LEDs. It may be you just need to try it. There are clearly some people who appear to be bothered by halogen lights, which (without a ballast) produce no measurable EMF either. Garth On Feb 15, 2007, at 9:42 AM, S. Andreason wrote: > That is a bummer. > > The LED bulbs I was referring to, are here on Ebay: > http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll? > ViewItem&category=16037&item=320072054014 > > I guess I shouldn't be surprised they are not all of a similar design. > > Stewart > > Marc Martin wrote: >>> They DO put out radiation, and make me everybit as ill as compact >>> fluorescents and sometimes more so than the regular ones. >>> >> >> Still, they are completely different technology than compact >> florescent bulbs, and we've already noted that they have different >> characteristics when taking meter readings, and at least some >> people here do not react to them when they did react to >> compact florescents. >> >> Also, it appears from recent postings that it may make a difference >> in who manufactures the bulb, as differences in the electronics >> driving the LEDs may be the difference between having symptoms >> and not. (I suppose people should state who the manufacturer >> is when saying that they do or do not have symptoms from a >> particular LED bulb) >> >> Marc >> > > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > |
Administrator
|
> NONE of these applies to LEDs. Assuming a manufacturer doesn't
> "mess it up" by using a switch-mode or transformer power conversion > circuit I wonder if there is any way to tell if an LED bulb is using any RF generating components (in advance, without buying it and testing it) ? For example, some LED bulbs advertise themselves as being "dimmable", while others say that they are not dimmable. Does this tell us anything useful? Marc |
In reply to this post by Garth Hitchens
I think Garth has it about right. I suspect it is the
chemicals/elements used in making the leds fluorescent, and the resulting wavelength because before that was done, older ones never bothered me. I'd suggest anyone sensitive to regular fluorescents not go nuts with leds till you've spent a lot of time with one, maybe even a flashlight, and just leave it on in your room all night, or nearby all day... see if you notice any problems. I thought they were great before being improved, but you know, if it isn't broke, fix it till it is... :) It may not have a measurable rf, but they absolutely have emf. As has been discussed before, absolutely everything does. I don't know their wavelength as I haven't looked it up. Radio doesn't seem to bother me much, but microwave and seriously x-ray do. There is something out there that can measure them, but I haven't looked it up. I did grab some links that might be useful for anyone wanting to know a little more about the leds: ======== http://www.worldchanging.com/archives/003669.html "It is also imporant to understand that the quantum dot stuff is just another fluorescent material, put on top of a short-wave LED." Quantum dot: A nanocrystal. Since the term emphasizes the quantum confinement effect it typically refers to the sub-class of nanocrystals that are small enough to exist in the quantum confinement regime, and more typically refers to fluorescent nanocrystals in the quantum confined size range. www.qdots.com/live/render/content.asp Fluorescence definition: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fluorescent Phophor definition: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phosphor#White_LEDs http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Photoluminescence ============= http://www.sylvania.com/BusinessProducts/MaterialsandComponents/Lighti ngComponents/Phosphor/FluorescentLamps/ chemical makeup ~ Snoshoe --- In [hidden email], Garth Hitchens <garth@...> wrote: > > Before you get too bummed, realize that what Shoeshoe is pointing out > may or may not be an issue for you, and what she is calling > "fluorescent" is dramatically different in concept and operation from > the flourescent lamps you are familiar with. > > Regular (tube-style) and compact fluorescent bulbs are mercury vapor > discharge lamps with a phosphorescent powder coating on the inside of > the glass. There are numerous things about most fluorescent bulbs > that cause radiated electromagnetic fields. > > - the electrical discharge itself through the long bulb > - the electronic ballast (now usually switching-style) which > generates a lot of "electrical noise" > - RF noise generated by the arc inside the bulb > - magnetic field radiated by the transformers in the ballast circuitry > - in addition to these sources of EMFs, most fluorescent lamps > "flicker" rapidly > > NONE of these applies to LEDs. Assuming a manufacturer doesn't > "mess it up" by using a switch-mode or transformer power conversion > circuit, there is NO measurable electromagnetic field (EMF) from an > LED other than the spectrum of the light itself. > > What shoeshoe is pointing out is that some LEDs (and ones likely to > be found in white colored LEDs) use phosphors which absorb and re- > radiate the light from the LED junction at a different wavelength in > order to produce a more pleasing color of light. It is this use of > phosphors that I assume she is calling "fluorescent". Shoeshoe, > please correct me if I'm wrong about your meaning. > > This use of phosphors in LEDs does not in any way change the LEDs to > output a higher electric or magnetic field, but it does produce a > different "light spectrum". Some people (like Shoeshoe) are > apparently sensitive to the spectra produced by phosphorescent > materials, and have a reaction to them. > > This certainly doesn't appear to apply to everyone that is ES, and > maybe not even to most -- as far as I can tell, I am sensitive to the > EMF field and noise produced by the ballast and discharge of typical > fluorescent lamps, but although I find some of the spectra of some > LED lamps "not pleasing", I can't detect any electrical sensitivity > to the fluorescent LEDs. > > It may be you just need to try it. There are clearly some people > who appear to be bothered by halogen lights, which (without a > ballast) produce no measurable EMF either. > > Garth |
Administrator
|
> http://www.worldchanging.com/archives/003669.html
> "It is also imporant to understand that the quantum dot stuff is just > another fluorescent material, put on top of a short-wave LED." Also, you should note that LED lighting is still in its infancy, and there are all sorts of ways still being considered to make the color of the light more pleasing. The Quantum dots you are referring to are a recent discovery, and have not yet been incorporated into any commercial products. So again, we probably need to pay close attention to the technology used in specific products, as one may cause ES problems, while another may not... Marc |
In reply to this post by Paresh
Hi,
That's probably going to depend on the individual. All the extra bright LEDs which seems to be what they make now are fluorescent bulbs, and they make me as ill as the ones that are called fluorescent. I posted a link some months back in here somewhere that tells you everything you ever wanted to know about LEDs and more... They are harmful to your eyes as well, when looking directly at them. ~ Snoshoe --- In [hidden email], "Paresh" <sunmoonyoga@...> wrote: > > > Are LED light bulbs good for e. sensitive people? Do you know of a source? Thanks. > Paresh > > http://home.earthlink.net/~sunmoonyoga/ > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > |
LEDs are NOT fluorescent bulbs.
LEDs are Light Emitting Diodes, which operate at low voltage/low energy and direct current - should be no radiation whatever. Fluorescents are high voltage and high frequency which radiate unless they are well shielded. Recent LEDs might have some tricky electronics in them that radiate, but that's for someone else to dig into. William --- In [hidden email], "snoshoe_2" <snoshoe_2@...> wrote: > > Hi, > > That's probably going to depend on the individual. All the extra > bright LEDs which seems to be what they make now are fluorescent > bulbs, and they make me as ill as the ones that are called > fluorescent. > > I posted a link some months back in here somewhere that tells you > everything you ever wanted to know about LEDs and more... > > They are harmful to your eyes as well, when looking directly at > > ~ Snoshoe > > > --- In [hidden email], "Paresh" <sunmoonyoga@> wrote: > > > > > > Are LED light bulbs good for e. sensitive people? Do you know of a > source? Thanks. > > Paresh > > > > http://home.earthlink.net/~sunmoonyoga/ > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > > |
In reply to this post by Snoshoe
The compact fluorescents are supposed to be pretty nasty, leaking
mercury and EMFs and more. Does anybody know about the compact full spectrum bulbs? The design is the same but they are supposed to be pretty clean. I love the idea of the compact bulb for environmental reasons but I don't like the fluorescents for the above reasons and also because they have an ugly light. The spectrum bulbs are obviously more expensive but if they, like the compact fluorescents used less electricity and lasted longer I would invest. The planet and I are worth it. Yolanda On Aug 12, 2007, at 6:46 PM, snoshoe_2 wrote: > Hi, > > That's probably going to depend on the individual. All the extra > bright LEDs which seems to be what they make now are fluorescent > bulbs, and they make me as ill as the ones that are called > fluorescent. > > I posted a link some months back in here somewhere that tells you > everything you ever wanted to know about LEDs and more... > > They are harmful to your eyes as well, when looking directly at them. > > ~ Snoshoe > > --- In [hidden email], "Paresh" <sunmoonyoga@...> wrote: > > > > > > Are LED light bulbs good for e. sensitive people? Do you know of a > source? Thanks. > > Paresh > > > > http://home.earthlink.net/~sunmoonyoga/ > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] |
Do you have a link to the kind of bulb you mean?
I think if it's fluorescent it will probably emit RF, because it has to raise the voltage some how. I would recommend experimenting with LED bulbs. There's also some purple coated regular bulbs that are supposed to match daylight. I have a couple of them and I think they're a good idea if you're stuck in artificial light during the day. They're pretty expensive and don't save energy though. On 8/13/07, Yolanda LaCombe <[hidden email]> wrote: > > The compact fluorescents are supposed to be pretty nasty, leaking > mercury and EMFs and more. Does anybody know about the compact full > spectrum bulbs? The design is the same but they are supposed to be > pretty clean. I love the idea of the compact bulb for environmental > reasons but I don't like the fluorescents for the above reasons and > also because they have an ugly light. The spectrum bulbs are > obviously more expensive but if they, like the compact fluorescents > used less electricity and lasted longer I would invest. The planet > and I are worth it. > > Yolanda > > > On Aug 12, 2007, at 6:46 PM, snoshoe_2 wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > That's probably going to depend on the individual. All the extra > > bright LEDs which seems to be what they make now are fluorescent > > bulbs, and they make me as ill as the ones that are called > > fluorescent. > > > > I posted a link some months back in here somewhere that tells you > > everything you ever wanted to know about LEDs and more... > > > > They are harmful to your eyes as well, when looking directly at them. > > > > ~ Snoshoe > > > > --- In [hidden email] <eSens%40yahoogroups.com>, "Paresh" > <sunmoonyoga@...> wrote: > > > > > > > > > Are LED light bulbs good for e. sensitive people? Do you know of a > > source? Thanks. > > > Paresh > > > > > > http://home.earthlink.net/~sunmoonyoga/<http://home.earthlink.net/%7Esunmoonyoga/> > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |