Charles on Multidetector

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
1 message Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Charles on Multidetector

SArjuna
> Charles wrote:
> everybody with the apropriate measuring tools can find out how reality looks
> like.
>
> Shivani replies:
Exactly. So, those who don't have good meters yet need to know which
to purchase! There is no point in your making vague remarks about certain
products, as that does not give us any useful information at all. It just
creates questions.

> Charles said:
> My statements are based upon such (confidential) reports.
>
> Shivani replies:
> What is the point of telling us this but not sharing the useful
information that you supposedly have? Why are you reluctant to be specific?

> Charles wrote:
> The german manufacturer has been to court in order to find that his
claims
> are inappropriate, and that he has to rectify them.
> This happened not once, but countless times.
>
Shivani replies:
Would you please BE SPECIFIC??!! Exactly what claims regarding the
Multimeter ll Profi were found to be inaccurate?
>
> Charles wrote:
> I am not going into details, but just give you a warning.
> If you still are going to buy their stuff, that is your own responsability.
>
> Shivani replies:
> A "warning" is useless without details. It easily appears to be backbiting.

>
> Charles wrote:
> I have no secrets. I have nothing to hide.
>
> Shivani replies:
Then why are you unwilling to share the specific information about this meter
that you say you have?

Charles wrote:
> And I am well aware why you want some details from me.
>
> Shivani replies:
I frankly don't know what to make of this remark, which seems to ascribe some
ulterior motive to my interest in details. I will repeat the reason for
my interest in this meter. People who are ES are subject to continued
exposure to high frequency electrical pollution, even after they install the GS
filters, because high frequencies are subject to the "skin effect" and flow over
the surfaces of many objects in the home or other buildings, including
woodwork, walls, furniture... as well as radiating from water pipes, phone lines, duct
work, radiators.... and being present in the water ES people use to shower.
ES people need a sensitive electric field meter in order to check their home
for these frequencies, and this meter must be able to note the presence of
the higher frequencies as well as distinguish high from 50/60 Hz frequencies.
And, this needed meter should be $100 or less, to be affordable to the
general public.
As advertised, the Multidetector ll Profi fits all these qualificatons.
If you have proof that their claims are not accurate, would you please just
share this information?
I am going to be on Public Radio soon talking about Electrical
Pollution, with people calling in with questions. I would like very much to finally
be able to recommend a good electric field meter with which people can check
their homes.
Regards,
Shivani


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]