Some out there may have had cat scans (brain xrays)
in the 1980s or early 1990s. Im wondering if these people are also sensitive to EMF. After Six CTs (each eqivalant to TEN chest xrays) I became sensitive almost instantly, but it wasnt until a number of years infront of computers that i found out CRTs were doing alot of the damage too. The late 1990s with cellular antennas blazing and computers on, the combination made my body begin to do strange things that doctors could not explain. stomach trouble near monitor, skin problems, eye problems, sleep problems. As I reduced the computer time the high levels of antenna emf continued and caused me great problems no matter were I went. (sharp pains in the skull) So shielding experiments began, and few did anything for me. Later vitamins and foods were an option to help the body have better defense to deal with radiation. So far some work and some do not, others yet to try. Health foods stores should take note and provide these esential items in a brochure or in a kit or something, otherwise most people have no idea what items to get to deal wit |
Administrator
|
>So shielding experiments began, and few did anything for me. Later
>vitamins and foods were an option to help the body have better defense >to deal with radiation. I'd be interested in hearing what specific things helped you. Marc |
This post was updated on .
CONTENTS DELETED
The author has deleted this message.
|
This post was updated on .
in my opinion, it is not the heat that gives the discomfort, but the
magnetic alternating fields of the lamp. Especially those lamps with small trafos inside, (for reducing the electricity costs) give enormous magnetic fields. Halogen lamps do use mostly trafos, but aside to that they have something in their light spectrum, that can be annoying as well. Greetings, Charles Claessens member Verband Baubiologie http://members.rott.chello.nl/cclaessens/ checked by Norton Antivirus |
Yes, you reminded me of the years under a Drafting table lamp, thats another long term exposure i had in addition to computer monitors and television equipment. Over ten years later, i find the new florecent bulbs extremely deadly. My friend has emf metres and we discoverd that Florecent bulbs, both tube and tradiational looking ones (shell filled with fine tube twisted in to that shape, ie Ikea Bulbs) This measurement was done with a EMF DENSITY metre, and it Peeked OFF THE SCALES, where with measuring a cell tower with the same metre, the tower readings were 1.8 to 0.8, then readings of the florecent bulb were 99.9 and higher!!! an shocking reading. for more info check out emf canada website, see Links page on this group So i recomend low power bulbs, and especailly avoid the MINI Florecent bulbs ( one inch long ) The best ive found are low power pot lights, the kind that are recessed into the ceiling, with soft lights. Direct sunlight can also have a great effect on EHS people, but as i said earlier, if the cellular companies are reducing desity from the antennas or if they are changing the output format, ie CDMA to 3G, then it has been clearified amoungst many in one area all at the same time that when these change, the effects from computer and lights c |
I think a few reamrks are her needed.
One cannot measure a bulb and a cell tower with the same meter. A bulb is low frequency and a cell tower is high frequency.. The bulb is measured with a Teslameter (for the magnetic field) in nT or Gauss. The cell tower is measured with a high frequency meter (the electrical field) in uW/m2. UMTS or 3G will not radiate at lower densities than GSM, but HIGHER. GSM base station can stand kilometers apart. In Germany, the 3G antennes are placed 300 meters apart. In the netherlands ths is 400 meters from each other. If you babble with a GSM, and the other person misses a word, the can repaet the missed word. However, if you send $100 via your 3G phone to another persons bank account, and the last bird flows in between, it is possible that the other person receives nothing on his bank account, but you may have $100.000 drawn from your account. Therefore, 3G must radiate more and the antenneas must be closer to each other. The official guidelines for max radiation for 3G are much higher than for GSM 900 and GSM 1800. Greetings, Charles Claessens member Verband Baubiologie http://members.rott.chello.nl/cclaessens/ checked by Norton Antivirus ----- Original Message ----- From: "factsnow" <[hidden email]> To: <[hidden email]> Sent: Monday, April 26, 2004 19:39 Subject: [eSens] Re: Cat Scans / Lamps > > Yes, you reminded me of the years under a Drafting table lamp, thats > another long term exposure i had in addition to computer monitors and > television equipment. > > Over ten years later, i find the new florecent bulbs extremely deadly. > My friend has emf metres and we discoverd that Florecent bulbs, both > tube and tradiational looking ones (shell filled with fine tube > twisted in to that shape, ie Ikea Bulbs) > > This measurement was done with a EMF DENSITY metre, and it Peeked OFF > THE SCALES, where with measuring a cell tower with the same metre, the > tower readings were 1.8 to 0.8, then readings of the florecent bulb > were 99.9 and higher!!! an shocking reading. for more info check out > emf canada website, see Links page on this group > > So i recomend low power bulbs, and especailly avoid the MINI Florecent > bulbs ( one inch long ) The best ive found are low power pot lights, > the kind that are recessed into the ceiling, with soft lights. > > Direct sunlight can also have a great effect on EHS people, but as i > said earlier, if the cellular companies are reducing desity from the > antennas or if they are changing the output format, ie CDMA to 3G, > then it has been clearified amoungst many in one area all at the same > time that when these change, the effects from computer and lights > c > |
--- In [hidden email], "charles" <cclaessens@c...> wrote:
> One cannot measure a bulb and a cell tower with the same meter. I would have thought the same thing, that is untill i witnessed the high readings. However it was not just this metres word for it, two highly sensitive people pointed out that two different florecent bulbs were bothing them, both types of florecent bulbs gave off a high reading on a RF Density metre. Please try it out and see what we did. Afterall light and sound are just different ranges of energy, somehow part of the florecent output consists of RF |
I seem to remember reading that either EM fields will cause incorrect readings
on some EM radiation meters or vice versa. The only radiation I would think might be emitted from a fluorescent light could be associated with high frequency transients being created within the power circuit, as a result of the electronic ballast, which may cause the wires in the power circuit to emit radiation, like an aerial. Like Charles however, I would be more inclined to suggest that these results are associated with improper equipment use, though only further experimentation by yourself will provide a definitive answer. -----Original Message----- From: factsnow [mailto:[hidden email]] Sent: Tuesday, 27 April 2004 12:43 PM To: [hidden email] Subject: [eSens] Re: Lamps --- In [hidden email], "charles" <cclaessens@c...> wrote: > One cannot measure a bulb and a cell tower with the same meter. I would have thought the same thing, that is untill i witnessed the high readings. However it was not just this metres word for it, two highly sensitive people pointed out that two different florecent bulbs were bothing them, both types of florecent bulbs gave off a high reading on a RF Density metre. Please try it out and see what we did. Afterall light and sound are just different ranges of energy, somehow part of the florecent output consists of RF Yahoo! Groups Links |
In reply to this post by charles-2
--- In [hidden email], "charles" <cclaessens@c...> wrote:
> I think a few reamrks are her needed. > One cannot measure a bulb and a cell tower with the same meter. > A bulb is low frequency and a cell tower is high frequency.. > The bulb is measured with a Teslameter (for the magnetic field) in nT or Gauss. > The cell tower is measured with a high frequency meter (the electrical field) in uW/m2. My friend that did the tests with me just reminded me of the Transformers that are in Large and Small Florecent Lights and Bulbs. If you have ever looked at a large florecent ceiling light, there is a black box about two inches by six inches, thats the transformer to ignite the florecent bulb's gas and create light. The new Light bulb look alikes that are now really Florecent tubes bent up in a twisted formation also have Mini Transformers inside the base. These transformers is where the RF is coming from. Please check this out with all types of florcent lights - testing with an RF metre, then do the same with any other kind of bulb and you will see what we discovered. This is why so many on this list are having trouble with grocery stores and shoppi |
Administrator
|
> These transformers is where the RF is coming from. Please check this
> out with all types of florcent lights - testing with an RF metre, then > do the same with any other kind of bulb and you will see what we > discovered. This is why so many on this list are having trouble with > grocery stores I remember reading something on the Internet where a large number of office workers all became electrically sensitive at about the same time. What had happened was that they had just replaced the florescent lighting from the old magnetic ballasts to the newer energy efficient ballasts. That story would seem to back up your statements that it is the transformer that it the real problem, not the florescent lights themselves. I think dimmer switches fall into the same category, and should be avoided if possible. However, I've found that EMF protection devices work very well for florescent lighting and dimmer switches. It is ususally just CRT monitors, laptop computers, and desktop computers where EMF protections devices often don't work out well (although I've found some that work well for these too) Marc |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |