In my search for a new car I've compiled
the EMF emissions for various models. Over the years I couldn't figure out why I felt ill after driving a new car. Now that I finally know about my EHS I'm a much more informed consumer. http://www.ahappyhabitat.com/cars.html Good thing I measured the Toyota Tundra (which was my preferred choice). It puts out a good 7 mili gauss onto the driver. By far the worst of them all. Surprisingly the Chevy Silverado puts out the least EMF of the pickups I tested. Hope this helps. Eli |
I read somewhere awhile back that the best overall car for EMS people
is the 1985 Mercedes 300D. There are very few engine electronics in a diesel as they use glow plugs, and that was the best model year prior to the advent of computers in the engines which started in 1986. The earlier 300D had lower fuel economy, Mercedes really perfected their design in the 1985 model year. And if you can find one, they can drive 500K miles or more, some have gone 1 million miles. So they are still young, even at 21 years age. --Kurt --- In [hidden email], "jaime_schunkewitz" <jaime_schunkewitz@...> wrote: > > In my search for a new car I've compiled > the EMF emissions for various models. Over > the years I couldn't figure out why I felt > ill after driving a new car. Now that I > finally know about my EHS I'm a much more > informed consumer. > > http://www.ahappyhabitat.com/cars.html > > Good thing I measured the Toyota Tundra > (which was my preferred choice). It puts > out a good 7 mili gauss onto the driver. > By far the worst of them all. Surprisingly > the Chevy Silverado puts out the least EMF > of the pickups I tested. > > Hope this helps. > Eli > |
In reply to this post by jaime_schunkewitz
Try a Renault scenic 2ltr dynamique YR2002 this is off the scale with my
trifeild meter (mind you does it make a difference as its 50htz rated) at sunroof level and dash, it drives me crazy if I drive it ! My 1999 Fiat Punto 1.2 no air bag is fine I suppose but of course it is still pumping out emfs at wheel arch and usual places. Funilly enough I have a varicose vein on my right ankle, the side nearest the wheel arch nothing on left - could be related ??? I shall visit you rating site thanks Paul UK [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] |
In reply to this post by jaime_schunkewitz
Independent of emf, new cars are notorious for chemical smells...many people have mcs as well. Paresh http://home.earthlink.net/~sunmoonyoga/ [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] |
In reply to this post by jaime_schunkewitz
Has anybody measured an electric car with a gauss meter?
I wonder if that is why GM recalled and scrapped all their cars in California?? There must be more reason than the oil companies seeing competition... I drive a 1984 Chevy diesel pickup. 0.35 mG at torso, and 0.6 mG at knees. I remember looking for a quieter vehicle 11 years ago. One Ford 1984 diesel I tried was 1 mG or more. That was a shocker, as just being a diesel wasn't enough. Stewart jaime_schunkewitz wrote: > In my search for a new car I've compiled > the EMF emissions for various models. Over > the years I couldn't figure out why I felt > ill after driving a new car. Now that I > finally know about my EHS I'm a much more > informed consumer. > > http://www.ahappyhabitat.com/cars.html > > Good thing I measured the Toyota Tundra > (which was my preferred choice). It puts > out a good 7 mili gauss onto the driver. > By far the worst of them all. Surprisingly > the Chevy Silverado puts out the least EMF > of the pickups I tested. > > Hope this helps. > Eli > |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |