CTIA vs. City and County of San Francisco

> abta.org/ctia-vs-sf-august-9-2012/
> Please join us at the U.S. Court of Appeals hearing for the CTIA-
> wireless association v. City and County of San Francisco lawsuit which
> challenges our right to know about safe use of cell phones.
> The hearing is at 9 am on Thursday, August 9 at the James R. Browning
> Courthouse at 95 7th St. in San Francisco. Here is the link:
> http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/calendaring/2012/05/30/nsf08_12.pdf
>
> The first hearing was in U.S. District Court last October and was
> quite fascinating. It is complicated but SF claimed victory but the  
> CTIA
> appealed and SF has cross appealed.
> The more the better- let’s show San Francisco and the nation (other
> cities and states are watching closely as they too want to legislate  
> but
> have been threatened with lawsuits) that we support their amazing
> efforts to stay in this battle as they could have repealed the
> legislation. We have Supervisor Avalos to thank for introducing new
> language and saving our right to know!
> Those battling cell towers, smart meters, EHS, MCS and others should
> be concerned as to how this plays out in the court. We all need to ban
> together in our efforts. I applaud all of you for your tenacity in the
> face of horrible adversity.
> Please spread the word of this to activists, concerned scientists and
> doctors, and to your MEDIA contacts (across the nation). If you live
> elsewhere and cannot attend, please share this with those nearby who  
> can
> be there in your place.
> San Francisco’s trend-setting cell phone Right to Know disclosure
> law signifies a pivotal shift in the raging debate over the hidden
> long-term health risks of cell phones. According to Dr. Devra Davis,
> “With the passing of this ordinance, the City of San Francisco has  
> taken
> a significant leap forward in promoting the awareness of health risks
> posed by cell phone use.  The progressive thinking that led to this
> event should serve as an inspiration to other cities and towns around
> the nation as they propose similar ordinances.  In addition, it is  
> to be
> hoped that its passage will spur the federal government to consider a
> national cell phone ordinance, which would allow the U.S. to adhere to
> the safety standards recognized by an increasing number of governments
> around the globe.”
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>