Well I bought this atomic clock because it was battery operated but I'm thinking that it might not be a good idea?
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed] |
Administrator
|
> Well I bought this atomic clock because it was battery operated but I'm
> thinking that it might not be a good idea? It might be fine... it doesn't seem like a battery-operated atomic clock would be putting out nearly the amount of EMF as a lot of things. Marc |
Wouldn't it be attracting more RF into the house? Loni
--- On Sat, 8/29/09, Marc Martin <[hidden email]> wrote: From: Marc Martin <[hidden email]> Subject: Re: [eSens] Atomic Clock To: [hidden email] Date: Saturday, August 29, 2009, 8:10 AM > Well I bought this atomic clock because it was battery operated but I'm > thinking that it might not be a good idea? It might be fine... it doesn't seem like a battery-operated atomic clock would be putting out nearly the amount of EMF as a lot of things. Marc [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] |
Administrator
|
> Wouldn't it be attracting more RF into the house? Loni
Doesn't it just pick up a radio signal once per day? That's nothing to worry about, unless you're worried about the presence of metal, antennas, etc. in your viscinity. But that seems like nothing compared to a computer. Marc |
No,
the DCF Signal works with 77,5 kHz, and this signal is constantly in the air from the sender There is no elektrosmog danger here. Greetings, Charles Claessens member Verband Baubiologie www.milieuziektes.nl www.milieuziektes.be www.hetbitje.nl checked by Norton ----- Original Message ----- From: "Marc Martin" <[hidden email]> To: <[hidden email]> Sent: Sunday, August 30, 2009 1:28 AM Subject: Re: [eSens] Atomic Clock > Wouldn't it be attracting more RF into the house? Loni Doesn't it just pick up a radio signal once per day? That's nothing to worry about, unless you're worried about the presence of metal, antennas, etc. in your viscinity. But that seems like nothing compared to a computer. Marc ------------------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Links |
If the signal is constant, then would there not be constant radiation from the clock? Loni
--- On Sun, 8/30/09, [hidden email] <[hidden email]> wrote: From: [hidden email] <[hidden email]> Subject: Re: [eSens] Atomic Clock To: [hidden email] Date: Sunday, August 30, 2009, 1:03 AM No, the DCF Signal works with 77,5 kHz, and this signal is constantly in the air from the sender There is no elektrosmog danger here. Greetings, Charles Claessens member Verband Baubiologie www.milieuziektes. nl www.milieuziektes. be www.hetbitje. nl checked by Norton ----- Original Message ----- From: "Marc Martin" <marc@ufoseries. com> To: <eSens@yahoogroups. com> Sent: Sunday, August 30, 2009 1:28 AM Subject: Re: [eSens] Atomic Clock > Wouldn't it be attracting more RF into the house? Loni Doesn't it just pick up a radio signal once per day? That's nothing to worry about, unless you're worried about the presence of metal, antennas, etc. in your viscinity. But that seems like nothing compared to a computer. Marc ------------ --------- --------- ------ Yahoo! Groups Links [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] |
Administrator
|
> If the signal is constant, then would there not be constant radiation
> from the clock? The constant signal is not coming from the clock, but is transmitted from somewhere else. And I believe that the clock is only "listening" to that signal for a few seconds each day. It's just like a TV or a radio station -- you're getting the EMF coming into your house whether or not you own a TV or radio. Marc |
In reply to this post by Loni Rosser
I have a battery operated combination Atomic clock, indoor/outdoor thermometer hanging on my dining room wall. I checked it with my Tri-field meter, and it barely moved the needle when held very close. The field dropped to nothing, just inches away. I doubt that there is any danger, at least not from the one I have.
Donnie |
Ok thanks everyone! I noticed that when I took it out of the bedroom My skin burnt less so I don't know if it is just a coincidence or what. I willexperiment with it. Loni
--- On Sun, 8/30/09, Donnie <[hidden email]> wrote: From: Donnie <[hidden email]> Subject: Re: [eSens] Atomic Clock To: [hidden email] Date: Sunday, August 30, 2009, 11:40 AM I have a battery operated combination Atomic clock, indoor/outdoor thermometer hanging on my dining room wall. I checked it with my Tri-field meter, and it barely moved the needle when held very close. The field dropped to nothing, just inches away. I doubt that there is any danger, at least not from the one I have. Donnie ------------------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Links [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] |
In reply to this post by Marc Martin
On the instructions it says that it searches out the signal every night at 2 am Fort Collins Colorado. Loni
--- On Sun, 8/30/09, Marc Martin <[hidden email]> wrote: From: Marc Martin <[hidden email]> Subject: Re: [eSens] Atomic Clock To: [hidden email] Date: Sunday, August 30, 2009, 11:11 AM > If the signal is constant, then would there not be constant radiation > from the clock? The constant signal is not coming from the clock, but is transmitted from somewhere else. And I believe that the clock is only "listening" to that signal for a few seconds each day. It's just like a TV or a radio station -- you're getting the EMF coming into your house whether or not you own a TV or radio. Marc [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] |
Administrator
|
In reply to this post by Loni Rosser
> Ok thanks everyone! I noticed that when I took it out of the bedroom My
> skin burnt less so I don't know if it is just a coincidence or what. If it's a new clock, it may be offgassing, which could make your skin burn. Marc |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |