AT&T 4G LTE coverage map envelopes 5 cities

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
5 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

AT&T 4G LTE coverage map envelopes 5 cities

KathyB
http://www.gizmocrunch.com/mobile/8394-att-4g-lte-coverage-map
Monday, 19 September 2011

The second largest carrier in the US further promises that they will be covering 15 markets before the year is up.



AT&T 4G LTE coverage map envelopes 5 cities So
 what is available at the moment? Chicago, Atlanta, San Antonio, Dallas /
 Fort Worth and Houston.

Now don't confuse 4G
LTE with 4G HSPA+ as they are not the same thing. If anything, the real
world tests AT&T ran on its LTE network last month showed us there
are major speed difference (download speeds of up to 25Mbps).

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: AT&T 4G LTE coverage map envelopes 5 cities

Marc Martin
Administrator
> The second largest carrier in the US further promises that they will be
> covering 15 markets before the year is up.

I'll note that I live in a city where they've had 4G LTE for months,
and I have NOT noticed any difference.  I'm far more bothered
by nearby sources of EMF -- computers, other people's
smart phones (especially in crowds), going to someone's house
that has a lot of wireless stuff in it, etc.

Marc
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: AT&T 4G LTE coverage map envelopes 5 cities

Loni Rosser
But Marc you have done a lot of healing and are much less sensitive than you were if I remember correct. For the severely EHS like myself it is life threatening power this 4G LTE.
 
The thing about this is that it's stronger and penetrates further. Loni

--- On Mon, 9/26/11, Marc Martin <[hidden email]> wrote:


From: Marc Martin <[hidden email]>
Subject: Re: [eSens] AT&T 4G LTE coverage map envelopes 5 cities
To: [hidden email]
Date: Monday, September 26, 2011, 11:50 AM


 



> The second largest carrier in the US further promises that they will be
> covering 15 markets before the year is up.

I'll note that I live in a city where they've had 4G LTE for months,
and I have NOT noticed any difference. I'm far more bothered
by nearby sources of EMF -- computers, other people's
smart phones (especially in crowds), going to someone's house
that has a lot of wireless stuff in it, etc.

Marc







[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: AT&T 4G LTE coverage map envelopes 5 cities

Marc Martin
Administrator
> But Marc you have done a lot of healing and are much less sensitive than you
> were if I remember correct.

It's true that I'm a lot less sensitive than I used to be, and it's also true that
cellphone towers have never really been a big problem for me -- my
problems mostly seem to be due to EMF sources within my own
house or workplace.

Marc
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: AT&T 4G LTE coverage map envelopes 5 cities

Loni Rosser
Hey Marc! 
 
Yes, well I guess we all respond different for sure!  I'm happy for you that you are better.
 
I can tell you that cell antenna radiation has destroyed my health living now in constant pain and fear, separated from my family, made me live in humiliation sleeping now on the side of the road (sheriff approached me this morning) and sitting in the mall every day because I can't tolerate my house, ruined my marriage and some friendships.
 
 At this point with the prospect of Lightsquared raining 4G LTE radiation down on every inch of earth it's hard for me to see the light at the end of the tunnel.
 
They don't know it but this will have catastrophic consequences to the next generation health and well being.
 
Loni
 


--- On Mon, 9/26/11, Marc Martin <[hidden email]> wrote:


From: Marc Martin <[hidden email]>
Subject: Re: [eSens] AT&T 4G LTE coverage map envelopes 5 cities
To: [hidden email]
Date: Monday, September 26, 2011, 1:23 PM


 



> But Marc you have done a lot of healing and are much less sensitive than you
> were if I remember correct.

It's true that I'm a lot less sensitive than I used to be, and it's also true that
cellphone towers have never really been a big problem for me -- my
problems mostly seem to be due to EMF sources within my own
house or workplace.

Marc







[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]