Re: air quality and e.m.-fields

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
1 message Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: air quality and e.m.-fields

johnmauersberger
Hello Franz,
I see what you mean from the picture. You mention the chestnut trees
dying. I've noticed the same sort of thing clear accross the U.S. A lot of
people probably wouldn't notice since they don't know one tree from another.
But I can notice that certain species look very much distressed.
Around here, most of the pine trees along the interstate have an
unhealthy yellowish cast. Out west, particularly in Montana there were many
areas where solid blocks of several hundred of acres where every conifer
tree was dead. The black locust trees leaves turn brown around here
beginning in July anymore except in areas where there are no cellular towers
for miles where they stay green until sometime in September. Various places
in West Virginia, at higher elevations where the trees are about at the
upper limit of elevation for many hardwood species there were large
stretches where the leaves came out very late & were stunted looking &
intersperced with these trees were many that were already dead. The hadn't
died off because they were in the understory & were light deprived. These
were as tall as any of their neighbors.
It's hard for me to believe that other people haven't noticed these
things & are alarmed by it. I've mentioned it to people & they hadn't even
noticed & didn't think it was anything to be alarmed at.
I know the difference between air quality between areas with good cell
phone reception & no reception is striking. When I'm driving on the
interstate sometimes in summer, even through rural areas I feel like I'm not
getting enough air. I take short shallow breaths. When I go to an area with
no cell phone reception, I breath deeply. I feel refreshed within minutes.
The air seems cooler & sweeter instead of dry & harsh.
These differences should be easiily measurable. But I doubt that anyone
with the qualifications & equipment has ever even thought of measuring the
difference between two such distinct areas. I'm going to send email to the
EPA, & as many university scientists in fields I think would be able to
research these things & see if I could stir any interest in investigatiing
this.

John M.

. ----- Original Message -----
From: <[hidden email]>
To: <[hidden email]>
Sent: Wednesday, December 29, 2004 10:58 PM
Subject: air quality and e.m.-fields


> Dear John M.
>
> I found your comment at
http://www.groupsrv.com/science/viewtopic.php?t=4863
>
> I think the same.
>
> Easter Monday 2003 I drove with my car to The Hague. There is a moment
that
> you see the city before you. There was a large brown sphere. See attached
> picture.
>
> Mind you, we had had a Saturday and Sunday with hardly any traffic and
> industry and this Monday was a holiday too. I suppose the traditional
> sphere appears because of car exhaust and industry gases. The Hague does
> not have much industry, it has mostly office buildings and many green
> parks. By the way, recently almost all the chestnut trees in town had to
be
> removed, because of some fungus they could not stand.
>
> Apparently the air was not able to clean itself in this sphere. I have
seen
> the same brown like a blanket at many places and like spheres around inner
> city with highrise buildings.
>
> I think the electromagnetic fields influence the air particles so that
they
> are kept together like a blanket or sphere.
>
> I think the air quality has been changed dramatically by the e.m.-fields,
> but the changed parameter is not a parameter that is measured usually, so
> that the people controlling the air quality are not alarmed.
>
> Frans van Velden
> [hidden email]
>


----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----


>