Cat Scans

Some out there may have had cat scans (brain xrays)
in the 1980s or early 1990s. Im wondering if these people are also
sensitive to EMF. After Six CTs (each eqivalant to TEN chest xrays) I
became sensitive almost instantly, but it wasnt until a number of
years infront of computers that i found out CRTs were doing alot of
the damage too. The late 1990s with cellular antennas blazing and
computers on, the combination made my body begin to do strange things
that doctors could not explain. stomach trouble near monitor, skin
problems, eye problems, sleep problems. As I reduced the computer
time the high levels of antenna emf continued and caused me great
problems no matter were I went. (sharp pains in the skull)
So shielding experiments began, and few did anything for me. Later
vitamins and foods were an option to help the body have better defense
to deal with radiation. So far some work and some do not, others yet
to try. Health foods stores should take note and provide these
esential items in a brochure or in a kit or something, otherwise most
people have no idea what items to get to deal wit

>So shielding experiments began, and few did anything for me. Later
>vitamins and foods were an option to help the body have better defense
>to deal with radiation.

I'd be interested in hearing what specific things helped you.

Marc

CONTENTS DELETED

in my opinion, it is not the heat that gives the discomfort, but the
magnetic alternating fields of the lamp.

Especially those lamps with small trafos inside, (for reducing the
electricity costs) give enormous magnetic fields.

Halogen lamps do use mostly trafos, but aside to that they have something in
their light spectrum, that can be annoying as well.

Greetings,
Charles Claessens
member Verband Baubiologie
http://members.rott.chello.nl/cclaessens/
checked by Norton Antivirus

Yes, you reminded me of the years under a Drafting table lamp, thats
another long term exposure i had in addition to computer monitors and
television equipment.

Over ten years later, i find the new florecent bulbs extremely deadly.
My friend has emf metres and we discoverd that Florecent bulbs, both
tube and tradiational looking ones (shell filled with fine tube
twisted in to that shape, ie Ikea Bulbs)

This measurement was done with a EMF DENSITY metre, and it Peeked OFF
THE SCALES, where with measuring a cell tower with the same metre, the
tower readings were 1.8 to 0.8, then readings of the florecent bulb
were 99.9 and higher!!! an shocking reading. for more info check out
emf canada website, see Links page on this group

So i recomend low power bulbs, and especailly avoid the MINI Florecent
bulbs ( one inch long ) The best ive found are low power pot lights,
the kind that are recessed into the ceiling, with soft lights.

Direct sunlight can also have a great effect on EHS people, but as i
said earlier, if the cellular companies are reducing desity from the
antennas or if they are changing the output format, ie CDMA to 3G,
then it has been clearified amoungst many in one area all at the same
time that when these change, the effects from computer and lights
c

I think a few reamrks are her needed.

One cannot measure a bulb and a cell tower with the same meter.
A bulb is low frequency and a cell tower is high frequency..
The bulb is measured with a Teslameter (for the magnetic field) in nT or
Gauss.
The cell tower is measured with a high frequency meter (the electrical
field) in uW/m2.

UMTS or 3G will not radiate at lower densities than GSM, but HIGHER.
GSM base station can stand kilometers apart.
In Germany, the 3G antennes are placed 300 meters apart.
In the netherlands ths is 400 meters from each other.

If you babble with a GSM, and the other person misses a word, the can repaet
the missed word.
However, if you send $100 via your 3G phone to another persons bank account,
and the last bird flows in between, it is possible that the other person
receives nothing on his bank account, but you may have $100.000 drawn from
your account.
Therefore, 3G must radiate more and the antenneas must be closer to each
other.
The official guidelines for max radiation for 3G are much higher than for
GSM 900 and GSM 1800.

Greetings,
Charles Claessens
member Verband Baubiologie
http://members.rott.chello.nl/cclaessens/
checked by Norton Antivirus




----- Original Message -----
From: "factsnow" <[hidden email]>
To: <[hidden email]>
Sent: Monday, April 26, 2004 19:39
Subject: [eSens] Re: Cat Scans / Lamps

--- In [hidden email], "charles" <cclaessens@c...> wrote:

> One cannot measure a bulb and a cell tower with the same meter.

I would have thought the same thing, that is untill i witnessed the
high readings. However it was not just this metres word for it, two
highly sensitive people pointed out that two different florecent bulbs
were bothing them, both types of florecent bulbs gave off a high
reading on a RF Density metre. Please try it out and see what we did.
Afterall light and sound are just different ranges of energy, somehow
part of the florecent output consists of RF

I seem to remember reading that either EM fields will cause incorrect readings
on some EM radiation meters or vice versa. The only radiation I would think
might be emitted from a fluorescent light could be associated with high
frequency transients being created within the power circuit, as a result of the
electronic ballast, which may cause the wires in the power circuit to emit
radiation, like an aerial. Like Charles however, I would be more inclined to
suggest that these results are associated with improper equipment use, though
only further experimentation by yourself will provide a definitive answer.

-----Original Message-----
From: factsnow [mailto:[hidden email]]
Sent: Tuesday, 27 April 2004 12:43 PM
To: [hidden email]
Subject: [eSens] Re: Lamps

--- In [hidden email], "charles" <cclaessens@c...> wrote:

> One cannot measure a bulb and a cell tower with the same meter.

I would have thought the same thing, that is untill i witnessed the
high readings. However it was not just this metres word for it, two
highly sensitive people pointed out that two different florecent bulbs
were bothing them, both types of florecent bulbs gave off a high
reading on a RF Density metre. Please try it out and see what we did.
Afterall light and sound are just different ranges of energy, somehow
part of the florecent output consists of RF





Yahoo! Groups Links

--- In [hidden email], "charles" <cclaessens@c...> wrote:
> I think a few reamrks are her needed.
> One cannot measure a bulb and a cell tower with the same meter.
> A bulb is low frequency and a cell tower is high frequency..
> The bulb is measured with a Teslameter (for the magnetic field) in
nT or Gauss.
> The cell tower is measured with a high frequency meter (the
electrical field) in uW/m2.

My friend that did the tests with me just reminded me of the
Transformers that are in Large and Small Florecent Lights and Bulbs.
If you have ever looked at a large florecent ceiling light, there is a
black box about two inches by six inches, thats the transformer to
ignite the florecent bulb's gas and create light. The new Light bulb
look alikes that are now really Florecent tubes bent up in a twisted
formation also have Mini Transformers inside the base.

These transformers is where the RF is coming from. Please check this
out with all types of florcent lights - testing with an RF metre, then
do the same with any other kind of bulb and you will see what we
discovered. This is why so many on this list are having trouble with
grocery stores and shoppi

> These transformers is where the RF is coming from. Please check this
> out with all types of florcent lights - testing with an RF metre, then
> do the same with any other kind of bulb and you will see what we
> discovered. This is why so many on this list are having trouble with
> grocery stores

I remember reading something on the Internet where a large number
of office workers all became electrically sensitive at about the
same time. What had happened was that they had just replaced the
florescent lighting from the old magnetic ballasts to the newer
energy efficient ballasts. That story would seem to back up your
statements that it is the transformer that it the real problem,
not the florescent lights themselves.

I think dimmer switches fall into the same category, and should
be avoided if possible.

However, I've found that EMF protection devices work very well
for florescent lighting and dimmer switches. It is ususally just
CRT monitors, laptop computers, and desktop computers where EMF
protections devices often don't work out well (although I've
found some that work well for these too)

Marc